Pages

Monday, July 19, 2010

My Inception review

My Inception review


Related image


Intro: am I the only one who thinks that people are giving the Matrix too much credit for this movie? What about Paprika? Oops!

Inception: This movie is centered on a man name Dom Cobb who uses a device that can help him steal ideas from someone's dreams. One day someone offers to help him get out of his dilemma by planting an idea in someone's head, to do this he needs to recruit a team. Of course, something goes wrong, so the team has to execute the plan before things get worse. 

I wasn't that impressed with this movie; I don't think the movie is bad however the creators could have done more with this movie. I could have co-written this movie because I had experience with dreams that this movie addresses like not remembering the beginning of a dream, being aware that you're dreaming and when you die in a dream you wake up. I like the mechanic of the dream world, what characters can do in a dream and the movie has a little bit of humor. The movie also does a good job of building suspense kind of. The way this movie ends will either make you happy or angry.

Dom Cobb is a professional thief who wants to clear his name of wrongdoings. My beef with him is that he plays a role in why the plan didn't work out. Also, we don't know what his life was like before this point. 

Arthur is Cobb's partner who plans out the jobs.  

Eames is a forger he can look like anyone in a dream, plus he's the comic relief.  

Ariadne is used to see this world through the audience's eyes, she's also the architect of the dream world. She also helps Dom with his issues.  

One of the many problems I have with this movie is that Dom shouldn't have been picked to do this job. I mean the person who hired him tested him to see if he can do this job and he failed so why did he still pick him? Also, the movie explains how the dream world works what's the point of that if characters don't have good memories? It's hard to root for the team to succeed because what they're doing is wrong. This movie would benefit from less sophistication and more creativity, the dream world shouldn't be realistic. It bugs me that this movie doesn't explore every aspect of dreams, what's the point of having a movie about dreams if you're not going to do that? The movie can also be boring because it kind of has slow pacing.  

Overall, despite how good this movie it's a waste of potential. I can't say this is the best movie that deals with dreams because I haven't seen all of them. I would recommend this if you like heist movies.  


Rating = Worth Seeing    

Monday, July 5, 2010

My review of The Last Airbender

 My review of The Last Airbender 

 

Intro: Let me get this straight Mr. Shyamalan you made this movie because of your daughter. She deserves better than this. 

The Last Airbender: This movie is centered on a boy name Aang who was frozen in ice for 100 years. After being free from the ice he learns that he's the last Airbender and the fire nation has been at war with the other nations in those 100 years. So Aang has to master the other elements in order to stop the fire nation. 

This movie is a disgrace to the series it's based on! To be fair making a movie recapping the first season was a mistake because you can't sum up 20 episodes in an hour in a half film. Then again show manage to do that but I digress. The director seems to be aware of this, so he tries to make up for it by giving us a lot of exposition. Doing this hurts the movie because people will feel like someone is reading them a bedtime story then watching a movie. What happened to show don't tell? 

It also ruins the dialogue because the characters don't feel like their having a real conversion. Do I really have to comment on the acting or lack thereof? The pacing in this movie will put you to sleep. The movie tried to add humor but it's so lifeless you don't notice it. I also notice some editing issues I mean we were told that things happened, but we don't see it. How did the fire nation become to most dominant force? I mean they can't fire bend without being near fire and they don't seem to operate like a unit. Also, how they capture the earth benders is a joke. 

Speaking of benders, the movie doesn't explain how that works, they take too long to bend the elements and the earth benders look weak doing it. The CGI doesn't help make the bending look good for the most part. Another thing that bugs me about this movie is the movie didn't cast the right race of people to represent the water tribe and the fire nation. Not only that character's names and other things are pronounced wrong in the movie what's up with that? The fight scenes in the movie weren't shot well because it was filmed in one shot in a way where it focuses on one group and then another. When we see other people fight it looks like they're waiting to get in the shot. The conflict towers the end of the movie will either make you laugh or be outraged. The characters are a downgrade from how they were in the show.  

Aang is scared, weak and helpless. Our hero ladies and gentlemen. Now I wouldn't have minded the writers taking this character in this directing if he was going to overcome those flaws in the movie but that didn't happen in any noticeable way. I find that he has to learn how to bend the other elements because we see that he can do it so what's the point of this plot point?   

Sokka is bruting in this movie which is a far cry from what he was in the show. He something rush into things and other times he collective. The problem with this is the writer's flip flop with the character doing this. Katana suffers from this too. 

Speaking of Katana (Sokka's sister) is motherly like in the show and that's all I have to say about this character. The only complaint I have with her is that she and Sokka have no reason to join Aang on his journey.   

Zuko (prince of the fire nation) is like his cartoon counterpart as far as having a short temper and looking for the Avatar to get back on his father's good graces. With that said he's not relentless about capturing the Avatar as he was in the series. Also, his scar is not noticeable.

Iroh (Zuko's uncle) is laid back and Zuko's voice of reason. I just wish the actor would show more emotion.  

Comm. Zhao (the main villain) is the Fire lord's, right-hand man. He's also cocky and ambitious. 

I can't think of anything I like about this movie. In closing, this may be a bad movie but it's not the worse adaptation. That honor goes to Dragon Ball Evolution.

Rating = Trash      

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

My Power Rangers the movie review

My Power Rangers the movie review 

Amy Jo Johnson, Karan Ashley, Jean Paul Bell, Johnny Yong Bosch, Steve Cardenas, Kerry Casey, Julia Cortez, Jason David Frank, Mark Ginther, and David Yost in Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie (1995) 


Intro: Is it too much to ask for a movie to be better than the show it's based on? 

Power Rangers the movie: This movie is centered on a superhero group called the Power Rangers. They learn that construction workers discover a human-sized egg that holds a monster called Ivan Ooze, so the rangers have to get to him before someone cracks the egg. That becomes difficult when Lord Zedd and Rita beat them to the punch and he shows the rangers he means business by destroying the command center, stripped the rangers of their powers and Zordon is dying. Alpha tells the rangers that there's a way to save him, but they have to go to another planet to do it, so they have to find new powers before it's too late. 

This is one of those movies that you like as a kid but doesn't hold up after all these years! I'm saying that by holding this movie to Power Ranger's standers. Yes! The show has cheesy lines and puns however this movie overdid it. Also, what's the point of this movie having the same opening as Star Wars if someone is going to read the text? The ranger's new weapons are a downgrade if you ask me. The Megazord fight is a joke because it's too one-sided and the way it ended was odd. 

Season three of Power Rangers handles some of the elements from this movie better like the ninja suit. When the rangers got the ninja suit in the show it gives them special abilities, in the movie they do nothing for the rangers. I wish the Rangers would do more to try and earn their new powers, this is another issue I have with the series. This movie tried to make family a theme of the movie but the creators did a poor job that it. The lesson in this movie is off-putting because the movie contradicts itself. Don't get me started on the CGI, it looks unfinished.   

The rangers are more or less the same as they were on the show. This will annoy people who didn't watch the show because they can't describe the ranger's personality. Plus, this movie has no connection to the show. What bugs me about them is how they treat Bulk and Skull in this movie, you'll see what I mean when you watch this movie.  

Speaking of Bulk and Skull why are they in this movie, they do nothing to help push the story or provide comedy for the most part.

Alpha is aggravating as usual. 

Zordon is the ranger's mentor we learn that he has history with Ivan Ooze and I wish the movie would explore that. 

Dulcea guides the rangers on the plant thereon. 

Lord Zedd and Rita (two baddies.) manage to be funny and menacing at the same time. The way Rita talks to Lord Zedd makes me question their relationship.   

Ivan Ooze (the main Villain) has a personality and seems to be aware of what's going on in the world when he's stuck in an egg. Plus, the creators did a good job at showing us how he's a bigger threat than Lord Zedd and Rita. His plan for world domination makes no sense and he could have achieved his goal if he was proactive. 

This movie can be funny and I like some of the design changes from the show like the command center, Alpha and the rangers suits for the most part. I'm fond that the rangers go on a journey to find new powers plus deal with the fact that Zordon could die. Doing that adds drama to the movie. 

Overall, this may not be a good movie but it's entertaining. I would recommend this to the fans. 

Rating = Rental     
  

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

My thoughts on fighting games

My thoughts on fighting games 

Image result for super smash bros brawl 


I have mixed feelings about fighting games. I like playing them because it's a fair game between you, the other player, and the CPU, kind of. You, the other player, or the CPU have the same abilities; what you do with them determines victory or defeat. Despite that I’m not that good at them, part of the reason why is because of the ridiculous combo combination. I find it insulting that I have to do them because your basic moves don't do as much damage. Plus, they are hard for me to execute; sometimes, I do it without trying. This is what ruins fighting games like MK and Street Fighter for me because I spend more time trying to figure out the combos than playing the game. There are some fighting games where you can set up the controls so that you can perform the special moves with ease, but I wouldn’t recommend that unless you want to be made fun of. 

I didn't have this problem with Soul Calibur 2, I can stop playing that game for years and know most of the moves. (I wish I could say the same for Soul Calibur 4.) I'm surprised that DBZ fighting games last this long, I mean, aren't you tired of playing the same story, using the same characters and moves? Fighting games may have the same blueprint and mechanics that doesn't mean that they all have the same gimmick. That's another issue I have with them; I wish they were different. This is what made the Super Smash bros games so popular; four players can fight each other, and instead of having to knock out your opponent, you have to either get a ring out or inflict as much damage until you knock him or her out of the stage. Something you don't have to do, that if you get the right weapon in the game, this is what helps make the game fun, it drops random weapons in the middle of the fight. 

It's a shame that Fighters Destiny isn't popular or became a well-known franchise because that game breaks away from the fighting game formula. In that game, you win by scoring the most points; you do that by performing certain moves. The same thing goes for Custom Robo, you get to customize your robot in that game, plus find cover and dodge your opponent's attacks. To be fair, I can understand why you would be bored with that game because all you can do is shoot lasers and bombs at your opponent. In Godzilla Destroy All Monsters melee you get attacked by the NPC. That can be annoying because you have to split your focus. That's all I have to say about fighting games for now if the developers try new things with this genre, it would be more popular than it already is.      

Monday, June 21, 2010

My Toy Story trilogy review

My Toy Story trilogy review 


Image result for toy storyToy Story: This movie is centered on a cowboy doll toy name Woody who's also Andy's favorite toy. That changed when Andy gets a new toy on his birthday, it's a space ranger name Buzz lightyear. Buzz is more advance than woody in every way to the point where it makes Woody look inferior. One day Woody tries to get Andy's attention but that blows up in his face and now he and Buzz are separated for Andy. To make things worse Andy is about to move. So, Woody and Buzz have to get back to Andy before the move.  

This is a classic story of the new replacing the old, heck you can argue that this movie foreshadowed what's going on in Hollywood. Almost everyone knows what it's like to have a favorite toy and then disregard it when you see something new. We also know what it's like to be turned down for someone better. This movie also did a good job of getting us inside the toy's head, I mean if toys were alive how would they think or feel about how we treat them? The theme of this movie is being wanted, what does it mean to people and how it can affect them if they're not wanted. The CGI was impressive the year it came out but now it's dated. The movie also did a good job of building tension.   


Woody is the leader of Andy's toys, he maintains morale among them. Because he's Andy's favorite toy he has an ego to the point where becomes jealous of Buzz and can be a jerk. 

Buzz thinks he's a real space ranger and this proved funny moments in the movie. This also raises the question did any of the toys start off like this? 

Slinky is loyal to Woody.  

Mr. Potato Head is cynical.

the ham piggy bank is a smart mouth. 

Bo-peep is kind-hearted. 

Rex is timid. 

Sid is a sick kid. I mean you have to be if you enjoy disfiguring toys. Despite that he's creative.
  
The only problem I have with this movie is I wish the writers would give Andy an arc of learning to appreciate what he already have. I'm not saying he's spoiled but he lost Buzz he acts like he doesn't have anything else. I find it odd that no one noticed that the toys are moved from a different spot. The movie gives Woody and Buzz too much focus. Overall, Pixar was off to a good start with this film.

Rating = Worth Seeing    



Image result for toy story 2Toy Story 2: Woody is preparing to go to Cowboy Camp with Andy, but something happens that causes Woody to miss out on it. Meanwhile one of Andy's old toys ends up at a yard sale so Woody tries to save him, however, he ends up in the car of a collector as a result of the rescue. So, Buzz and the gang have to find Woody and bring him back home before Andy gets back. 

This is one of those sequels that isn't better than the original. I like how it has almost the same stake as the first film but with a few changes. The same thing goes for when the movie recreates scenes from the last movie. The movie also shows us what the toys are like in different environments like in a toy store or in the hands of a collector. I'm fond of how this movie handles two plots because they both feel different plus, they both complement each other. The theme of the movie is abandonment, the toys have to deal with the fact that Andy will become too old for them and how being abandoned can affect them. The also deals with immortality vs loyalty. The movie also has a good twist towards the end.   

Woody learns about his origin in this movie and he has to figure out if he wants to stay with Andy or not? 

Buzz is flat in this movie he's just the loyal friend. The movie finds a way to bring back the old Buzz. 

Jessie is cynical about being a toy. That's understandable considering her backstory and it's heartbreaking when you see it. What bugs me about is she's helpless and the end of the movie and how she got over her moon. 

Stinky Pete is kind and wise. I'll also feel sorry for him because he doesn't know what it's like to be loved by a child. 

This movie has the same problems as the last movie and that is too much focus on Woody and Buzz. The subplot with Rex is pointless and I'm annoyed with the Star Wars reference. There is part of the last act that was wasted and there are moments in the movie that feel like filler. Overall, this is a fine sequel that builds off of the last movie. 

Rating = Worth Seeing 



Toy Story 3 (2010) - IMDbIntro: WOW! A trilogy where all three movies are good, that's quite an achievement. 

Toy Story 3: While Andy is preparing to go to college his toys are preparing to go to the attic. However, something happen that caused them to end up in a daycare center and the toys made themselves at home. That changes when they learn that the daycare is not what it seems to be, so they decide to escape the daycare and go back to Andy.  

This movie is the best one out of the three! The reason why I feel this way is because the story isn't centered on Woody or Buzz, the story affects everyone. I like seeing how the characters are coping with Andy not wanting to play with them anymore. This movie made me feel bad about how I use to treat my toys, especially my Green Ranger action finger, for those of you who know me know the story behind that. The movie has moments where you will laugh, cry and be at the edge of your seat. How the toys plan on escaping will remind you of a prison escape movie. You can argue that the themes of this movie are purpose and being together. I'm glad the creators waited eleven years to release this movie because it helps us appreciate those themes now that the kids who grew up watching these films are older.  

Woody is still loyal to Andy, but he has to figure out if he wants to be by his side or his fellow toys? 

I feel sorry for Buzz because it seems like the writers don't know what to do with him without being back his gimmick.  

Ken is the comic relief of the movie. 

Lotso Is the head of the daycare and he's lovable. 

One of the few problems I have with this movie is the conflict in this movie involves misunderstanding. There are moments where this movie is similar to the last film and the last act can be contrived in some areas. All in all, this is one of the best Trilogy, that's saying a lot because there isn't a lot of good trilogies. It's sad to see this come to an end because I would like to see a spin-off where toys are being replaced with technology. 

Rating = Treasure Chest 

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

My Titan A.E. review

My Titan A.E. Review 



Titan A.E.: After Earth has been destroyed by an alien race called Drej the survivors are scattered around space. Meanwhile, a space pirate name Capt. Joseph found Clae, who has the map to Project Titan that can save the human race. The search for Titan becomes difficult when the Drej catches on to them, so they have to find it before they do.  

This movie is Waterworld, but in space. The movie also reminds me of Star Wars. I like the world-building; it's interesting seeing how humanity is dealing with Earth being destroyed. The Animation isn't good because it tried to mix 2D animation with CGI, and it doesn't look good. (not from a lack of trying.) Also, the film has some entertainment value. The characters are fine but left more to be desired. 

Clae (The main character) is the relucted hero. The problem is there isn't a moment where we start to like him I mean, he complains and acts like he's all that, but he isn't. If he was, he wouldn't get captured so many times and think he can talk his way out of trouble. When he learns that he could save the human race, this was his response. 

Clae: What's in it for me? 

You're saving the human race!!!! What do you mean, what's in it for you!?! See what I mean? How can I root for him if he's self-centered? I understand he has a tragic backstory, however that doesn't justify how he's behaving. 

Akima (One of the crew members) is the sassy love interest, and that's it. That's all I have to say about her. Yeah, I don't buy her being into Clae because she seems to be put off by him not wanting to save humanity. 

Stith is a hothead who wants to hurt someone or something. 

Gune is the brains of the crew. 

Capt. Joseph is an enigma because we don't know much about him beyond his connection to Clae's past. 

The Drej (The villains) are boring! They have no reason to feel threatened by humans, just like you have no reason to feel threatened by bugs. 

Despite liking the concepts in this movie, the writers wasted them. I wish we knew the humans point of view on living in spaceThere is a scene in the movie where one of the characters is naked, why!?! Also, some of the music doesn't go well with some of the scenes. There are plot holes around how Titan works, the conflict between humans, the Drej, and how space works in this movie. Also, the twist in the movie serves no purpose; it might as well not be in the movie. 

Overall, this movie fell short to be considered underrated and it didn't end Fox Animation on a high note. To be fair, it suffers from behind-the-scenes issues. 

Rating = Rental 

Monday, June 14, 2010

My Mortal Kombat review

 My Mortal Kombat review 


Intro: So, in order to protect the Earth from being invaded, Earth's fighters have to win a tournament ten times. You can’t have the best two out of three. Also, don’t you wish we would have this instead of wars or trial by combat?  

Mortal Kombat: This movie is centered on a man name Liu Kang who learns that his brother was murdered, so he goes out to find the killer. He learns that the killer is hosting a tournament called Mortal Kombat and he has to compete in it to reach him. That becomes difficult when he sees that the competition is more than what he bargained for and the stakes are high. So, Liu Kang and the other earth fights have to win the tournament to protect the earth.

Calling this the best video game movie wasn’t a fair statement considering the lack of competition at the time. Don’t get me wrong, it’s fine as an adaptation but that doesn’t help make it a good movie. As bad as the Street Fighter movie was, I understand why the movie went in that direction it's because you can’t have a movie with just fighting. The story in this movie is OK ( Despite the fact that it’s a rip-off of Enter the Dragon.) however it could have been better. The movie set up interesting things with the character it’s just that the writers don’t flush them out. 

I understand why this movie is rated PG-13 because you don’t want to alienate the kids who played this game. Plus, the R rating wouldn’t help make this movie better. I would like to know how this tournament is structured I mean, I find it odd that none of the earth fighters fight each other. Another issue I have with the movie is the CGI hasn’t aged well. (To be fair, it didn’t look good back then.) Characters don’t always react when they see someone or something unnatural happen, one of the fights is lame, and how one character used a line from the game is contrived. 

Liu Kang is a tortured character. Not because his brother was murdered, it's because he struggles to come to terms with his destiny. Despite being short-tempered, he can be sarcastic.   

Johnny Cage is a movie star who's the comic relief and self-centered. 

Sonya is an FBI agent who's self-reliant. It's a shame that she and Liu Kang are not close because they both want the same thing. What bothers me about her is the movie doesn't do much with her. Also, she becomes helpless in the last act of the film. 

Kitana is wasted in this movie! Besides being eye candy, she's just in the movie to guide Liu Kang. She was suppose to be his love interest but that didn't get enough focus.  

Raiden is the guarding of the earth realm. He serves as a mentor for the trio. My issue with him is his advice is on the nose.   

Shang Tsung (the main villain) is power-hungry but is calm and collective. 

There isn't much I like about this movie beyond the soundtrack and one touching moment in the movie. Overall, this is an OK movie and I use the term loosely. I would recommend this if you like Kung Fu films. 

Rating = Rental 

Monday, May 31, 2010

My review of Prince of Persia the sands of time

 My review of Prince of Persia the sands of time 

 

Intro: Disney I thought I was going to watch a Prince of Persia movie, not The Fugitive. Oops!

Prince of Persia the sands of time: This movie is centered on one of the Prince of Persia name Dastan who's celebrating his victory over the battle of Alamut. That's short-lived when he's accused of a crime he didn't commit, so he has to prove his innocence. That becomes complicated when he learns about a conspiracy involving a dagger that can manipulate time. So, Dastan has to stop it before it's too late.        

This movie is The Fugitive but in a different setting and not as good. I understand why the writers wrote a different story from the game because the game's story is thin. However, going in this direction doesn't help make this movie a good adaptation. If the writers are not going to follow the story from the game, then what's the point of calling this Prince of Persia? Not only that this movie borrows elements from other Disney movies. 

The Dagger is underused in this movie because it's only used to rewind time. It can do more than that in the game. The reason why I prefer the plot in the game over the movie is that the game proves character development, character dynamics and the stakes are high. This movie is lacking those three things I just mentioned. There are scenes in the movie that are time filler, the characters are bland, a plot point that goes nowhere, people playing hot potato with the dagger and the ending is problematic.  

Dastan is fun-loving, snarky and loyal. What bothers me about this character is that he shouldn't have been in the movie. I mean King has two sons so why is he in this movie if he can be replaced with one of the two? Ever heard of the saying no one likes a third wheel? 

Princess Tamina is, is, excuse me. (Half an hour later.) OK, where was I? Oh! Yeah, Princess Tamina is disappointing. I mean she comes off as feisty but she's helpless for the most part. Her dynamic with Dastan is childish, they're bickering like nine-year-olds. What bugs me about her (Besides her not having a bow and arrow.) is she doesn't have the same name as her video game counterpart why? She also could have done a better job explaining the limits of the dagger.       

Sheik Amar is suppose to be the comic relief character but he doesn't do it for me. 

Nizam (the main villain) is a lowkey and manipulative bad guy. His motivations are understandable however I wish the conflict he creates had emotional weight.  

I like that this movie incorporates some of the elements from the game like the parkour and scenes from the game. The movie has some good visuals and it has some entertainment value. Overall, this is an OK action/adventure movie. I would recommend this if you like the Mummy.  

Rating = Rental   

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

My review of Disney's Dinosaur

My review of Disney's Dinosaur 

 

Intro: OK I'm not going to compare this movie to the land before time

My Editor: Really? Then why are your figures crossed? 

Me: Darn it! 

Dinosaur: This movie is centered on an Iguanodon name Aladar who lives on an island with his lemur family. His world turn upside down when a meteor strike destroyed the island so they have to find another place to live with the help of other herbivores. That becomes difficult without food, water and they are being chase by Carnotaurus. So the group have to do there best to stay the course. 

This is an overlooked movie I can understand why I mean the marketing didn't do this movie any justice. The CGI was impressive for it's time, it blends in well with the real world environment. Despite the Dinosaurs have the ability to speak they feel like real animals in how they behave. Plus, we would have a hard time making out what's happening in some scenes. The story may be simple be it works in the movies favor because these are Dinosaurs it doesn't have to be complex. I like the Carnotaurus because they don't talk that makes them more threatening. I'm surprised that this is considered a family film because of how violent it is. The theme of this movie is survival we see the dinosaurs trying to survive the aftermath of the meteor attack and they have different ways to go about it.   

Aladar is brave and compassionate. However he has to learn how to stand his ground. 

Kron ( the group leader.) is ruthless because he believes in the survival of the fittest. Having this mindset creates tension between him and Aladar. What bugs me about is that would he leave his sister Neera behind if she wasn't strong enough? 

Speaking of Neera she's the opposite of her brother. 

Zini ( one of the lemur.) is the comic relief. 

Yar ( Aladar's adopted father.) is grumble but caring. 

Plio is the nurturing one of the Lemurs. 

Eema and Baylene are elderly dinosaurs who prove humor of there own.        

One of the problem I have with this movie is the dialogue is distracting I mean they talk about things that they shouldn't know about or doesn't exist yet like school. The CGI can look dated at times. I don't like the title of this movie I mean why is it called Dinosaur if it's not about one Dinosaur? The movie address natural selection and I wish it did more with that. The movie could have ended differently if someone wasn't stubborn.   

Overall this is a decent Dinosaur movie that should have gotten more attention. 

Rating = Rental 

Thursday, April 8, 2010

My review of A Goofy movie

My review of A Goofy movie 

Image result for goofy movie


A Goofy Movie: This movie is centered on Goofy's son Max trying to impress his crush, Roxanne. That results in him getting in trouble and Goofy getting a disturbing phone call from the principal so Goody plans a fishing trip so the two would bond. Of course, the trip doesn't go as planned so the two have to get through it the best way they can. 

WOW! How was this movie overlooked? What I like about this movie is that it's different from the other Disney movies at the time. Yes! The movie has songs and dances however it isn't a fairy tale story it's a father and son story. The songs are used to push the story. This is one of those movies that is timeless because of Goofy and Max trying to find common ground with each other a lot of people relate to that. The songs in the movie help push the story and the movie can be funny at times. Surprisingly this movie can be mature at times. 

I like Max because he's a good kid who's struggling with getting his crush's attention. Oh, the things we do for the girl of our dreams. Also, he isn't disrespectful towards his father it's just that he's embarrassed that he has some of his traits.  

Goofy is goofy no pun intended. He's a loving father who wants to be close to his son because of the relationship he has with his father. 

Pete is Goofy's co-worker who helps Goofy with his son, Pete is more of a strict father than Goofy. 

The only problem I have with this movie is that it wouldn't exist if Goofy and Max talk to each other about what happened in school. Overall this is the best father and son story I've? However, I would feel that way if Goofy was like Pete. I'm not saying you shouldn't be strict with your kids however they need to know you love them. I would recommend this movie to the whole family. 

Rating = Rental 

Monday, March 29, 2010

My TMNT movie review


My TMNT movie review


Related image


Intro: Parents how do you expect Hollywood to produce action/adventure movies for kids when you complain about violence every chance you get? What do you want the bad guys and good guys to do play patty-cake? 

TMNT: This movie is about a report name April O'Neil reporting on a crime wave being caused by a group called the Foot Clan. She almost becomes a victim when she is saved by four mysterious figures who she later learns their humanoid turtles. When the leader of the foot knows who the turtles are he sends his henchmen after them, this results in them losing someone they know, and one of their own gets hurt. So the Turtles have to regroup and figure out what their next move is going to be? 

This is one of those movies that hold up fine after all these years. I'm impressed with the stunt work the actors who are playing the turtles can do in those suits. The movie borrows elements for the cartoon and the comic book that this movie is based on. The theme of this movie is family, it deals with what family means and they should be there for one another. I'm fond that we have an explanation for how the villain has so many foot soldiers.  

Leonardo is the leader of the turtles. 

Raphael is the hothead and rebellious one of the turtles. Due to that, he has a love-hate relationship with Leo. 

Michelangelo is the immature one of the pack. 

I wish I can say that Donatello is the smart one but there isn't enough tech in this movie for him to display his knowledge. 

Splinter is the Turtle's mentor. My beef with this character is I find it hard to believe that he can learn martial arts the way he has.

Casey Jones is an ally of the turtles. 

April O'Neil is another ally to the turtles and thank goodness she isn't helpless. The only gripe I have with her is I don't buy her dynamic with Casey Jones. 

The Shredder is the leader of the foot clan and he's manipulative. 

The problem I have with this movie is that it doesn't feel like it's about the turtles. With that said this is an OK movie I would recommend this to Turtles fans. 

Rating = Rental  

Monday, January 18, 2010

My Book of Eli review

My Book of Eli review


Image result for the book of eli


Intro: So we have an action/adventure movie that deals with religion, now we're getting somewhere. 

Book of Eli: Set in a post-apocalyptic world a man name Eli travels west to deliver a book that's the last of its kind. Meanwhile, he bumps into a man named Carnegie who also wants the Book because he believes it will give him power. So Eli has to avoid him and get the Book to its destination. 

This movie should be the blueprint for how to make religious films applying to the general public. I like how this post-apocalyptic world is set up almost everything or anything can be used as currency. I appreciate that this movie isn't preachy with its religious theme however it could have been better if there were characters who are either against religion or indifferent to it. Doing that would add conflict in the story beyond fighting over something. I'm more interested in the war after learning why Eli's book is the last of its kind. The plot twist took me by surprise even though you could've figured it out. 

Eli is an enigma, some scenes shows that he's not that noble. The only complaint I have with him is I don't know how he was able to survive his injuries. 

Carnegie ( The main villain.) is manipulative. It's kind of hard to see him as a baddie for the most part because he's doing what he's doing to rebuild society. 

I only have two problems with this movie they are the plot holes and the movie can feel slow at times. Overall this is an OK movie, I would recommend this if you like post Apocalypse movies. 

Rating = Rental