My rant about villains

My rant about villains 

 

Do you remember Cruella De vil? You know the villain from 101 Dalmatians well she's getting her own movie. No! This is not a joke, I'm not high, drunk, on meth or having a fever dream. There is a trailer for this movie. Who asked for a standalone movie on Cruella? This movie should be called Devils Wear Prada 2 because that's what it looks like. I doubt she's one of Disney's best villains. Since we're on the subject of female villains I'm tired of not seeing them get their comeuppances, I mean what's the point of them being villains if we don't see them get beat up? No! I'm not advocating violence against women however if you don't like the idea of female baddies getting pounded then don't have them as villains. Disney is not the only one doing this Sony and WB are making movies about the baddies as well. If this doesn't tell you that Hollywood is running out of ideas, I don't know what will. 

The problem I have with villains getting solo films is that it makes them empathetic or sympathetic to the viewer. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, in fact, it can make them scarier when we see things from their point of view. For example, I heard Hitler wanted to be an artist, if that's true you don't think it's sad that he turned out the way he did? Then again you can argue understanding bad guys makes them less scary because you know how to deal with them. Making movies about villains can be an issue if the creators make them victims after the fact. Also, you could risk trivializing their motivation. With that said the downside to this is if we do it too often lines get blurred. Basically, it's a role reversal we view the bad guy as the hero and the hero as the bad guy. Plus, we have to choose between the lesser of two evils. This is one of the many things that hurt the Inhumans series and the Pirates of the Caribbean films. 

My editor: Wait a minute! If that's how you feel about the subject, then why did you watch the Mandalorian? 

Me: First of all, Bounty Hunters operate in the grey area I mean what they do benefits both sides. Second, we explore the Galaxy through the perspective of the Jedi for the most part. This show gives us a different point of view. Finally, if you don't think anyone should get paid for taking a life then you shouldn't support the Troops, FBI, CIA, etc. 

My point is just because the bad guy is the main character doesn't mean you have to root for or feel sorry for the character. Godfather, Scarface and Breaking Bad wouldn't be a hit if that was the case. Also, you don't want to run the risk of deconstruction the bad guy and ruining the integrity of that archetype. What happened to bad guys being evil for evil's sake? We can't get caught up in thinking everyone is misunderstood or victims because we still have to hold people accountable for their actions. 

Despite the world not being clear-cut evil does exist, if you don't believe that then you shouldn't have a problem with being a victim of assault, rape and mass shootings. The people who do these things shouldn't be held accountable for their actions because when you deny evil you deny responsibility. I know people are put in a position to do bad things but where do we draw the line? I mean how do you distinguish someone being a victim of circumstance from someone being evil? You can say what you will about Power Rangers that's one of the few kid's shows that shows kids that not all villains are pure evil.

I don't have any issues with sympathetic villains however it shouldn't come at the expanse of already establish characters unless they're obscure. That's what bothers me about the Joker movie. What the writers did with the character in that movie we already got with Carrie. Plus, there's no reason to have sympathy for a villain who enjoys causing death and destruction. I'm not saying you can't do it, but the ends don't justify the means regardless of if he's doing it for attention or to prove a point. I didn't mind the Venom movie because he was an anti-hero in the comics, but Sony wasted this character by turning him into a joke. Plus, Spider-Man wasn't in the movie. I mean for an anti-hero story to work you need a hero to bounce off of, that's what made the Deadpool movies work. Heck, I wouldn't mind seeing Bane Conquest get adapted. I would like to see a Riddler movie because geniuses are not appreciated. 

Fans of Power should be outraged that Starz is producing a prequel series on Kanen. Kanen said he was never good so why do we need to see his upbringing? (To be fair I don't see Kanen as the bad guy in that series, but I digress.) Speaking of prequels do you think Luke Skywalker would save his father's soul if he knew that he killed children? If that doesn't make him as evil as the emperor what does? What I took from how Anakin became Darth Vader is that unforgiveness causes people to do bad things. This is something that most people struggle with because A there are things that we consider unforgivable like rape and murder. B no one should tell you how you should feel when someone wronged you because it's not our place to do that. With that said how do you expect to have world peace if you don't have peace within yourself?  

I'm not crazy about horror films but this affects them too. I mean writers tried to humanize the killers are you kidding me? They should get beat up for doing this because it makes the killer less scary. In the original Halloween movie, we were told the killer is pure evil, in the remake, the writers ruined that by turning him into a victim. The remake of Nightmare on ELM Street was trying to make Freddy look like he was falsely accused of a crime and killing the kids of the people who killed him as playback. Doing this to the baddies is no different from turning a character like Superman into a bad guy. 

Despite that, there are exceptions to the rule like Mr. Freeze, Dr. Octopus, and Thanos. Before Batman the animated series Mr. Freeze was a forgettable villain, now he's someone you feel sorry for because he's doing bad things to try and save his dying wife. Spider-Man 3 did a terrible job at this with the Sandman. The same thing goes for Spider-Man Homecoming. That's one of the issues I have with Mr. Freeze it's hard to care about him saving his wife if we don't know what their relationship is like. Spider-Man 2 made Dr. Octopus compelling by having him complete his science project at the expense of others because he believes it will benefit mankind. After realizing the error of his ways, he sacrifices himself to save the city because he made his bed and he has to sleep in it. Infinity War gave Thanos a humanitarian reason to wipe out half of the universe, plus he made sacrifices to do that. Despite that, he was still labeled as the bad guy because A he had no reason to do this and B he didn't consider how this would affect the survivors. 

The bottom line is we are not meant to root for the villains. They exist to show us what happens when you're selfish, cruel, abuse your power, and the pathway to hell is paved with the best intentions. You can't always make excuses for it and you shouldn't. (Also, not every villain needs a backstory.) If you do root for the bad guy that says a lot about you. Sympathetic villains exist so we can show compassion for them not defend their actions. That's all I have to say about this subject, for now, what do you think about villains in media?     

My rant about free speech

 

My rant about free speech

 

Intro: I didn't want to talk about this at first because I didn't think I had a lot to say about the subject. However, something happened to our soon-to-be former President that bothers me. 

OK I know last year was challenging for almost everyone now that we're getting the vaccine sooner than expected things could get a little bit better. (My reaction to what happened on January 6.) Oh, you have got to be kidding me! After that President Trump has been ban from using any social media site. Now they have a right to do that however this scares me, I mean if they can ban the President from social media what made you think it won't happen to you? Plus, they could lose consumers.  

It's hard for me to blame President Trump for what happened because first of all, someone can argue that his supporters don't know how to read between the lines. Yes! He said if we don't fight, we won't have a country, however, I don't think that was meant to be taken literally. For those of you who are lawyers, how many times do you tell your clients if you want custody of your kids, you have to fight for them? Then again you can argue that he insinuated the situation because he showed no remorse over this, he didn't berate his supporters and he encouraged the Liberate Michigan movement. That's the problem with reading between the lines you could be wrong half of the time. Also, what about Rep. Mo Brooks? I mean what he said was more violent than what President Trump said. 

Second, the people who storm the Capitol are not kids! Do you really think people wouldn't have done that if President Trump didn't promote the idea that the election was stolen for mouths? Even if he said that the election wasn't stolen it doesn't matter because we are divided. I mean look at the last election it divided people, there was a story of a mother who threw her 8-year-old son out of the home because he voted for Mr. Trump. 

Finally, if you're going to hold President Trump's feet to the fire you should do the same thing to the media and authority figures. They're guilty of either spreading false information or not telling us the whole story. Do you remember the game telephone where you tell a story to one person and another and another to see if everyone going to tell the same story? That's how news outlets are now. For example, whenever a White person commits a crime, the media makes excuses for them. 

They're pushing a narrative that they are above committing crimes when we know that's not true. The media try to make the Capitol invasion about gun control or domestic terrorism. May I ask how? When people broke into the Capitol they did different things like taking a tour of the building, taking pictures with police, stealing, looking for proof that the election was stolen and everyone else was acting like they were in Project X. As far as gun control there was only one gun involved in this situation, so what are they talking about? I don't agree with the definition of domestic terrorism because it's no different from a revolution. Revolutions can get bloody just like a protest can get violent. So how can we view one thing as bad and not the other if we can't separate the two? 

If it was up to me, I would charge the invaders with breaking and entering, aggravated assault, and vandalism. I don't like the idea of social media banning people for false information because A they didn't care about that until now as far as I know. B This could happen to anyone I mean can you tell the difference between someone lying, exaggerating, and being misinformed? Let me get this straight you have to work with people you don't like but you can lose your job for having an opinion that people frown upon. How does that work? This is why we don't deserve to survive this virus because we let our political views push each other away and we take away people's jobs because they said something we don't like. 

When you're honest with people they react like this. 

News flash that's the price of free speech (With the expectation of promoting violence against someone.) someone is going to say something you're not fond of. People shouldn't be censored, lose their jobs or their life because of it. The fact that it does happen tells me that what the person said could be valid. If that's not the case then nothing they say shouldn't bother you, when it does you can either ignore them or change your image. I'm sorry the last suggestion won't help much because people will say bad things about you no matter what. Like I said before they don't need a legit reason to dislike you and they don't need our permission. 

Also, society needs to have a better attitude about people saying nasty things about the dead. If anyone badmouths someone who died, we shouldn't berate that person because it's not our place to do that. Do you think parents should be vilified for saying good riddance to a man who did inappropriate things with their kids and got away with it? People should have the right to express how they feel about the dead regardless of whether or not they like what the person said. Should people never fart because you don't like the smell of it? ( I know that's frowned upon but that's a sign that you have a good digestive system.) If the answer is no, then that's my point. Really, this is a backhanded compliment I mean you didn't respect the person when he or she was alive now that the person is dead you want to act like you have home training. Now if someone said something egregious at the funeral that's a different story. sidenote the dead can't defend themselves is not a good enough reason for people to not say negative things about the dead. We can't defend ourselves from authority figures abusing their power. So please come up with a better reason than that.  

Just because we have free speech that doesn't mean it will protect you from anyone who will respond in a violent way because there are certain things you shouldn't say to certain people. For example, do you think it's acceptable to say disrespectful things to a man in his own home? If the answer is no, then that's my point. Also, everyone is not going to take your opinion about any subject seriously, especially if you're not familiar with the topic. I'm not saying you can't or shouldn't talk about sports but you're not going to be a part of the group. Gatekeeping is not a bad thing because they're protecting the standards. Let's use the Olympics for example, would you be outraged if the Olympics is reduced to the same standards as the Special Olympics because the competitors are complaining about how hard it is to get a gold medal? If the answer is yes, then that's my point. (No offense to disabled people.) 

That's what annoys me about SJWs, dating coaches, and feminists because they ruin the subjects that they talk about. For example, if you don't know what it's like to be the non-select guy and you don't want to find out. Then you shouldn't be talking about them or giving them advice. Fans need to gatekeep Star Wars, comic books, or any franchise from SJWs because they ruined anything they get involved with. Feminists have no business talking about how terrible men are because they don't acknowledge the role, they play in men doing messed-up things. I'm not saying that you shouldn't be a part of the conversion however don't act like you were there from day one. This is why I don't talk about politics because I don't know much about it. 

Look it's bad enough that we're losing our right to bear arms we shouldn't lose our free speech as well. How can people learn how to be insertive without it? Walking on eggshells with street dudes and women is hard enough. It's overkill to do that with everyone else. This makes me question how can people still do Jury duty? Do people still trash talk when they play games online? Speaking of playing games online that's what annoys me about online gaming. There's a difference between heckling someone and being disrespectful. Online gamers keep crossing that line, if you're not going to say these things to the person's face you shouldn't say them at all. 

How can we learn or improve ourselves if everyone tells us what we want to hear instead of what we need to hear? I can't believe how much our culture has changed in almost twenty years. Heck, we ate up CM Punk's rant ten years ago. When American Idol first aired people praised the original judges for their brutal honesty now you get vilified for doing that. Do I really have to comment on how this is hurting comedy? There was a time where if you take a joke too far someone will let you know. Now that everyone finds everything offensive it's hard to take people's complaints seriously. This makes it hard for comedians to experiment with jokes because they're too worried about upsetting people. Like I said before offending people comes with the territory sometimes you have to take a leap of faith. What's the point of promoting diversity if we can't be individuals? I'm surprised no one is rioting or protesting over this as far as I know. If you want to live in a bubble live on an island or move to China.             

The bottom line is this free speech should be protected because without it it's going to be harder to communicate with people than it already is.   

My review of Pixar's Soul

 My review of Pixar's Soul 

 

Intro: A Pixar movie without a short that can't be good. 

Pixar's Soul: This movie is centered on a middle-aged musician teacher name Joe who wants to play professional Jazz. He gets his chance to play with a jazz band but that becomes difficult when he's in a coma due to him falling into a manhole and his soul is in limbo. So, Joe has to figure out how to get his soul back to his body.

This is one of Pixar's most ambitious films! The movie deals with the concept of souls as far as how do souls play a role into who we become? The body-switching gimmick worked fine in this movie however it's hard to make it funny without it feeling cliche. I'm glad that the movie doesn't spend most of the time in the soul world because that would have been distracting. The CGI in the movie is good but not outstanding. The themes in the movie are passion vs obsession, your passion can turn into an obsession. This is relevant today considering what's going on in the world plus it's easy to be obsessed with something you're passionate about if you're not good at it or fail to realize that you're good at other things.  

I don't have much to say about Joe beyond his love for Jazz and he isn't happy with his life.  

22 is a soul who has no interest in living a life for understandable reasons. I wish this character has a knowledge vs experience dynamic with Joe. Also, this movie did something to undermine his or her credibility.      

One of the problems with this movie is that it can be too much for kids and make them testy if parents don't talk to them about it. The movie set up plot points that I wish got more focus because that would help the movie. The themes could have been done better if the movie explored them more. Is it me or does the designs of the souls in this movie look like candy? 

Overall, this is the only film I enjoy seeing this year that isn't saying much. I would recommend this if you like coco and inside out. 

 

Rating = Worth Seeing 

My review of the Mandalorian seasons one & two

   

My review of the Mandalorian seasons one & two

 

Intro: I am the only one annoyed that the fans call the baby in this series baby Yoda when it's clearly not Yoda?  

The Mandalorian Seasons one & two: This series takes place five years after Return of the jedi and it focuses on a Mandalorian Bounty Hunter name Din Djarin also referred to as Mando. He does what Bounty Hunters do until one day he was hired to capture a baby alien instead he decides to take him back to his kind. That becomes difficult because there are remnants of the empire who are after this baby, so Din has to protect him. 

After being subjected to the prequels and the sequel trilogy this series was refreshing. This is what I was expecting from the Solo movie which is a man exploring the Star Wars universe. Going back to the sequel and prequel trilogy this show did something to fix aspects of those two trilogies that bother me and other people. Unlike other Star Wars properties, this series feels like a Western, heck this could give Firefly a run for its money. Fans will be happy to see some familiar faces in this series and elements only they would notice. The violence in this show is not too much of kids if you ask me however, I would exercise caution. There are moments where the show can be funny and emotional as well. This series has a good message for parents about knowing when to step back when it comes to their child. The show makes you question if the new republic is any different from the empire? 

Din Djarin is a loner who's a resourceful and effective bounty hunter. I appreciate that we see that he has a heart without the kid involved. Speaking of the kid we see that he becomes fond of him however I wonder why he would expose him to the violence of his job? What bugs me about this character is that he's a cliche I mean I'm tired of seeing bounty hunters growing a conscious when it comes to women and children. This makes me question how long has he been doing this? Now I wouldn't mind this if he was breaking away from his conditioning from the Mandalorians. Also, because Din wears a helmet it's hard to tell what he's thinking and feeling at times most of the time. Speaking of his helmet don't get me started on his armor.  Another thing is it me or does mando sound like a slur?     

Greef Karga is the leader of the bounty hunter guild who's uptight about his money, he's also a wild card in this series. 

Cara Dune is a former rebel soldier who loves a good fight, she also has a good rapport with Din because both of them are similar. I like the direction this series took with this character because it works as a redemption story. We learn that she lost her home plant in episode 4 but she doesn't talk about the friends or family she lost.     

Moff Gideon (the main villain.) is the leader of the remnant empire. He's a dangerous and ruthless man who's trying to fill the vacuum that's created by the destruction of the empire. 

One of the many problems with this series is that it sets up plot points to be explored in the spin-off series. What's the point of establishing something just for it to be continued in a different series? I'm not crazy about the two characters this show introduces I'll give you a clue as to who they are. One is from the Clone Wars series and the other is a character we thought died in Return of the Jedi. The reason why the character from Return of the Jedi bugs me is because I'm worried that he or she will step on the main character's toes, will it's too soon to say if this character has done that. Also, despite enjoying the episode this character is in the way it was directed was sloppy.   

As far as the Clone Wars series character goes, I don't like that this show tries to connect with that series because you have to watch that series to understand some of the things that's going on in the show. Plus, this show doesn't feel like it's in the same universe as the movies. It's hard to be invested in the stakes in this show because it's so small and the way the last episode ended is underwhelming. Goku I mean Grogu (The baby's name.) annoys me not because I think he's the most disgustingly marketable character since Pikachu it's because the baby raises more questions about Yoda's species than answers. Also, you start to resent Jedi's who are force-sensitive.  

Overall, this is an enjoyable series that I would recommend if you like Westerns.            

My thoughts on Death Battle

 My thoughts on Death Battle 

I like the concept of Death Battle despite it not being new. Death Battle is a web series created by Screwattack.com, that put two characters from comic books, manga, movies and video games against each other in the battle to the death. This is similar to celebrity deathmatch but not as bloody. Sometimes they mix it up by doing four-way fights and live-action fights. We talk about wanting to see certain characters fight it's just that we couldn't play it out until now.

I first learned about this thought everyone talking about the fight between Superman and Goku. I enjoyed the fight it looks like the people behind it put a lot of work into it. With that said that doesn’t change the fact that people were not happy with the outcome of this fight. I had a feeling that Superman would win that fight because it seems like the creators were overcompensating Goku by giving him senzu beans, the power pole and having him go super saiyan 4 despite it not being canon last I checked. That’s one of the problems I have with that fight Goku cheated by taking a senzu bean. 

To be fair this is an issue I have with these fights I mean they give a character all different abilities from different sources. The end result of the fight between Superman and Goku bothered people so much that they want a rematch. The rematch was worse even with better graphics. That’s another thing that bugs me about this series it seems like the people behind it don’t put as much time or care in most of these fights as they did with the Goku vs Superman fight, I mean that fight felt like an event. 

I don’t know if this started it, but people are losing interest in this series because they think the people behind this show are bias. I can understand why because I do notice that. For example, the fight between Thanos vs Darkside they gave Thanos an unfair advantage by giving him the infinity gauntlet. I wasn’t crazy about the Mario vs Sonic fight because it wasn’t a fair fight. I understand why the creators would put these two against each other but that doesn’t make it a good idea. So, let me get this straight Batman can’t beat Spider-Man but he can beat Captain American what the fudge? I didn’t know my little or pretty pony can put up a fight against Marvel and DC characters. That would explain why boys are watching this series. So yeah, I can understand why this would bother people about this series. I know we have substitutes for death battle like one-minute melee and DBX but they don’t do it for me. Don’t get me wrong there is nothing wrong with those alternatives, but I like how death battle directs their fights for the most part. 

Overall, Death Battle has been around for ten years and this series can do more to make it better.            

The People vs Netflix

The People vs Netflix 

 

Intro: I know so many people have already talked about this, but I don't care, the reason why I'm doing this is that there is something about people's reacting to what Netflix did that bothers me. I'm not saying they shouldn't react the way they did however it's still an issue for me but I'm getting ahead of myself. Also, I want to wait until the legal action taken against Netflix gets resolved before I say anything, but I have a feeling that it won't rule in Netflix's favor. Forgive me if I go off-topic I have to, in order to make my point.  

In case you've been living under a rock, Netflix is facing a lot of backlash over a movie they produce, I'm not going to say the name of the movie because you know what I'm talking about. I haven't seen the movie or the trailers I just saw the poster, looked up summaries of the plot and that was enough for me to understand the outrage. Look whether or not this so-called movie was suppose to be a coming-of-age story or a social commentary on how the media have influence over kids it's overshadowed by the fact that this movie sexualizes children!!! You can tell a story about kids being exposed to sex and sexual exploitation is wrong without committing the act, which is what this movie failed to do. You can do that by dropping hints that it's happening in the movie, or better yet write a book about it. When you do it that way, we won't be subjected to seeing it happen. This movie disgust people to the point where they unsubscribe from Netflix. This affects Netflix to the point where they have to raise the subscription fee. I can't believe that no one who worked on this movie objected to the kids being exposed like this. 

Not only that there are people who are defending this garbage why!?! 

                                                                                                                      

                                                

The reasons people have for defending this movie is that it's misunderstood, you can't judge something without seeing it, Netflix made a mistake and they shouldn't be punished for it. First of all, it doesn't matter if the movie is misunderstood or not it doesn't change the fact that Netflix created child pxxn. Second Netflix should be punished for this mistake because last I checked creating child pxxn is illegal and frowned upon. If a man directed this so-called movie, you better believe he would be thrown under the jail. Speaking of jail time, the state of Texas is filing criminal charges against this company for producing child pxxn. The CEO of Netflix is standing by his decision of greenlighting this movie and agrees with the people who defend it. He should face some consequences for this and Netflix should go out of business for this. The same thing goes for Rotten Tomatoes, how this movie got 87% on their website is beyond me. 

Despite people's outrage over this movie being justified, it doesn't change the fact that this reaction makes them look like hypocrites. Let me ask you this do you think it's a good idea for minors to have babies? If the answer is no then why did we make teen pregnancy a part of our culture over ten or twenty years ago? There have been so many TV shows and documentaries about this at the time, heck Teen MOM is still airing new episodes. If your argument is the point of this show is to discourage teen pregnancy screw that! You're encouraging this behavior by giving them attention, housing and food stamps. What have they done to earn those things?  

If teen pregnancy is frowned upon then why do we make movies about it and give those movies Oscars? 

 
   

                                        

When I was in public and private school the teachers threw a baby shower for pregnant girls what the fudge!?! There is nothing special about being a teen mom or a single mother. Speaking of single mothers do I really have to common on the damage single mothers cause to their kids and everyone else by thinking they can raise kids without a man? What about bullying do you think that's something kids should be subjected to? 

What needs to happen for you to take it seriously?       

   

Does this make you angry? If the answer is yes, then why are you not mad at Hollywood for trivializing it and taking it too far? In Dragon Ball Evolution a bully ran over the main character's bike, in the latest Power Rangers movie a bully tried to snap one of the kid's wrists, in Shazam the bullies hit a disabled kid with his car, in the Flashpoint tv shows a sports team brand one of their teammates and in Cxxxxs the main character stabs her classmate with a pencil. Where's the outrage people? What happened to we need to protect our kids? I have a feeling that some of you who threw a fit over Netflix was involved in the rioting and looting this year. If you were involved, then you don't get to have an opinion about Netflix because you don't have the moral high ground. I understand why people did those things however it doesn't change the fact that you're not setting a good example for your kids, I mean do you want your children to tear up the house because they're upset? If the answer is no, then why are you tearing up everything around you? 

Do you see what I mean when I said people look like hypocrites? Look I'm not trying to make you look disingenuous however you can't have it both ways. You can't be outraged with how Netflix is hurting kids and ignore everyone else doing it. I'm wondering what you're planning for kids who are in the system? I mean I hear people talk about how bad things are for kids who are in social services and foster care. So, what are going to do for them? My point is this Netflix getting in trouble is not a victory if we don't continue to call out people or organizations for abusing and exploiting children. That's all I have to say about the subject for now.        

My tenet review

My tenet review 

Intro: A line from the movie: don't try to understand it feel it. 

Me: I should've listened to the warning. 

Tenet: This movie is centered on a CIA agent called the protagonist, he is chosen from a mission to prevent War World 3. This mission becomes difficult because it involves time manipulation. So he goes to a secret organization called tenet to figure out how to use time to work for him? 

I agree this is a mind-blowing Bond film, just not in a good way. I understand why this movie got mixed reviews because the movie can be head-scratching. It's not that I can't grasp the concept of time inversion it's just that it raises more questions than answers and it opens up a can of plot holes. Gravity should have played a bigger role in time inversion. The movie even acknowledges that it doesn't know all the time paradoxes. The explanation we get would have helped if we understand what people are saying in the movie. How time works in this movie eliminates any stakes in the movie. This movie has the same issues as the other Mr. Nolan films as far as no characters, fights scenes are shot too close for the most part, the movie demands your full attention and it has no humor in it. Well, it does have jokes but they fell flat. Why is Michael Caine in the movie if he only has two minutes of screen time? 

The protagonist is a stander CIA agent. That's sad because there is a scene in the movie where we could have gotten inside his head but the director didn't take advantage of it. 

Neil is kind of a laidback character who helps the protagonist. There are times where he feels like the main character because he knows more than we think. 

Kat is the main villain's wife, she's a character stuck between a rock and a hard place. The creators tried to use her to add emotional weight to the movie however it doesn't work if all the parties are not involved. Also, I can't believe how tall this woman is. 

Sator ( the main villain) is wasted I mean the writers could have done more with him after learning his backstory. This guy is scary I say that because of his motivation for what he's doing. 

I'm sorry but I can't think of one thing I like about this movie. Overall this is not the best movie that deals with time, I don't think it's terrible but it could have been better. I know Mr. Nolan worked on getting this movie on screen for years, however, If I can understand how time works in his other films better than this one then something is not right. I wouldn't even recommend this to Horologist.  

Rating = Rental     

My New Mutants review

 My New Mutants review 

Intro: Despite not being crazy about the horror direction this movie is going I was willing to give it a chance. Having some of the powers that the X-Men have can be scary. The movie could also explore what does having these powers can do to you, mentality and emotionally? Yes! We had some of this in the other X-Men films however that wasn't the main focus and we don't see characters overcoming the problems they have with their powers. (This is something else I want to see more of in future X-Men films.) I'm surprised that writers didn't make more horror stories with the X-Men because you can come up with terrifying situations with these superpowers. With that said was this movie worth the wait let's find out... 

New Mutants: This movie is centered on five teenagers who are held against their will in a treatment facility where they learn to come to terms with their powers and personal issues. That becomes difficult when strange things start to happen at the facility so they have to figure out what's going on before things get out of hand. 

I can see why this movie was held back for years because it's a mess. Seriously why make us wait for this movie if you're not going to do anything to make the movie better? What hurt this movie is the lack of context. Besides one of the teens we don't know how long the others have been at this facility, how they got there and how does this place operates? If you like horror movies you might be let down by the horror aspect of the movie because the movie is not as scary as the trailers.

Part of the reason why is because the scares happen at random. The twists in the movie didn't surprise me because the movie drop too many hints. I was annoyed that this movie references an X-Men villain because I want to see him or her enough with the teasing! Speaking of villains the movie used a baddie from the new mutants comic and the writers could have done more with this character. You can argue that the theme of the movie is fear but it wasn't done well. This group of teens is nothing to brag about because the pack lacks different personalities. Plus only one of them stood out and they don't feel like real teenagers for the most part. 

I can't comment on Dani because I can't characterize her. She just going through the motions in this movie.    

Roberto is friendly in his own right. Despite his powers ruining his love life, he doesn't feel like he belongs at the facility. I wish the movie could have done more with him. 

Rahn Sinclair is the kind and caring one of the bunch. This girl knows how to work her magic you'll see what I mean when you watch the movie. 

Sam is tormented by what happened that cause him to be at the facility. That's what bothers me about him. I understand why he's like this however he should have come to terms with it by now.  

lllyana Rasputin is the only character that stood out in this movie because she has a punchable face. She's a jerk to Dani for no reason and her backstory doesn't justify her acting this way towards her. 

Dr. Reyes is not the best doctor to help these kids. I say that because all she does is study and talk to them. It seems like she's not making any progress with them. What bugs me about her is how different she is from her comic book counterpart. Also don't you find it odd that she's the only one running this place?  

I appreciate that this movie tried to give us something different. I like that the movie gives characters that the general public is not familiar with a moment to shine. You can watch this movie without knowing anything about the X-Men.   

Overall this movie wasn't that bad but it wasn't good either. That's a shame because it could have been better than it was. If you want to see a horror/mystery version of the Breakfast club I would recommend this. 

Rating = Rental    

My thoughts on the Batman trailer

My thoughts on the Batman trailer 

 

So, a trailer for the latest Batman movie was released over the weekend at DC fandom. This took me by surprise because the filming for this movie was short-lived do to wasn't going on in the world. I'm not sure if I want to see this movie if it ever comes out because I don't want to look like a hypocrite. I mean I've been complaining about how Batman has been overexposed and I don't want to encourage DC/WB to continue doing that. It's been eight years since we got a Batman film and the general public hasn't been exposed to a lot of new DC characters. So far, we are introduced to three new characters they are Cyborg, Shazam and Stargirl. Let's be honest here is anyone really excited to see these three again? If I do decide to see this movie you can't say anything to me because of Aquaman. I mean if his ability to communicate with sea creatures is lame then why did his movie make over a billion dollars? With that said let's get into what I think of this movie. 

I want to strangle DC/WB because this trailer made the movie look promising. I wish this studio would put this much effect with the other DC characters, but I digress. It looks like this movie is going to be a mystery film. This should make Batman fans happy because we've been waiting for a movie like this for a long time. We did see Batman do some detective work in the other films however those are not detective stories. Well, we did get that with Mask of the Phantasm it's just that a lot of people didn't know that movie came out in theaters. The Riddler is the right villain to put Batman's detective skills to the test, I hope he pushes his detective skills the way The Joker pushes Batman to break his rule in the dark knight. Speaking of the Riddler he seems to be more menacing than what we have seen in the past, he reminds me of the Riddler from Batman earth one and year zero. Another thing this Riddler could be an anti-hero because he's trying to expose a conspiracy and living clues for batman to follow. The trailer opens with the Riddler tapping up a dead man's face that says no more lies, he even says what's the cost of a blind eye? I have an idea of what he's trying to expose but for the sake of possibly spoiling the movie I'm going to keep that to myself. Hardcore batman fans will know too. 

The trailer also has two other characters they are Selina Kyle and Oswald Cobblepot. It looks like this movie will focus on them becoming Catwoman and the Penguin, we see Selina Kyle trying to break into someone safe, but she doesn't have her costume. I hope it's handled a lot better than how the Gotham series handle their backstories. I want the dynamic between Batman and Catwoman to be done properly in this movie because I wasn't happy with how it was done in the past films. I don't know what role the penguin will have in this movie he could be a disposable bad guy.   

Now onto Bruce Wayne/Batman, there isn't much to say about Bruce Wayne because we barely see him in the trailer. What the creators do with this batman could make or break the film for me. I say that because we see he beat up one of the thugs and he overdid it. That was the highlight of the trailer for a lot of people, I hope he isn't like the punisher in this movie because that's not Batman. Also, he may or may not be on good terms with the GCPD, in one scene he's at a crime scene with them and in another scene, he's at odds with them. I like his bat-suit because he looks like he going to war. I wish I can say the same about the batmobile it looks like a regular car for the most part. I know that he hasn't been Batman for a long time, but he can do better than this. 

Here are the problems I have with this trailer I'm annoyed that this movie takes place in a realistic world. We already had that in Mr. Nolan's Batman films why not embrace the comic book elements of Batman? Also, I don't like the FBI is involved with trying to figure out the mystery because it's distracting. I'm having a hard time buying that Batman has been around for two years because everyone in Gotham doesn't know about him. Overall, this movie could be considered the best Batman movie and help the Riddler gain popularity. That's all I have to say about this movie for now.            
        

Stargirl season one review

Stargirl season one review 

Intro: Is it really that hard to give us a TV show without the female lead being a Mary Sue I mean promote feminisms? 

Stargirl: This show is centered on a girl named Courtney Whitmore who's trying to adjust to her new life with her stepfather and brother in Arizona. Things are about to get more complicated for her after she learns that her stepfather Pat was a part of a superhero group called the Justice Society of America and she believes that she's the daughter of one of the members. Meanwhile, the Injustice Society of America resurface to put their plan in motion. So Courtney and Pat have to work together to figure out what they're planning and stop them. 

This series is mixed for me because it didn't have the best start and it didn't get better until episode 8. If you were expecting this series to be lighthearted prepare to be disappointed, there's a difference between being lighthearted and colorful. I like the idea of telling a story about legacy characters but the writers rush that idea. Also the new JSA shouldn't have been able to put up any fight against the IJS because they don't know how to use there powers. Don't get me started on there costumes because some of them look cheap. The people who worked on this series are clueless about how high school work and how teens are, you'll see what I mean when you watch this series. The conflict between the heroes and villains could have create a social commentary on does the ends justify the means? However that was wasted because the series didn't give the characters a chance to process it. This show also suffers from plot holes, inconsistencies and the climax is underwhelming. The last scene annoyed me because it undermined the opening of this show. 

Courtney Whitmore/Stargirl is not a likeable character because she's reckless and stubborn. Because she's like that she put people in danger and got someone killed. I understand the writers are trying to give her character flaws to overcome however it's done in a way that makes her look stupid or delusional. I'm not saying this character doesn't have good qualities, we see that she's will to stand up to bullies and she's forgiving. However they're overshadowed by her bad traits. I refuse to believe that a girl like her is considered a loser, do you see what I mean by not understanding high school work and teens? I would like to know how the cosmic stuff works I mean it acts like a dog around Courtney.        

Yolanda Montez is the reserved one of the group who's also an outcast. After seeing her backstory that explain why she's alienated by her peers I don't feel sorry for her. I'm not saying she deserves the treatment that everyone is giving her however she should have known better, what she did is not new. Despite that I do feel bad about how her family treats her I'm not saying that they don't have the right to feel the way they do about what she did that doesn't mean that they shouldn't reassure that they still love her instead of acting like they disown her. What bothers me about her is that she doesn't take responsibility for what she did.  

Beth Chapel is a bright girl who loves to talk to the point where she doesn't know when to stop. That's an issue for me because this is a common complaint people have with Black girls and women, I guess the writers didn't think about that. She's also lonely to the point where she hangs out with her parents that's sad. I guess the writers are aware of how annoying she is so they turn her into the voice of reason. My gripe with her is her high tech glasses seem to have no limits.  

Rick Tyler is a troubled kid who lost his parents and lives with a abusive uncle. He's also hotheaded in a protective way that understandable considering he's the only guy on the team besides Pat.  

Speaking of Pat/S.T.R.I.P.E. is an upstanding and brave man who was the sidekick of Star Man. His relationship with Courtney is frustrating because he try's to mentor her but she's being pigheaded and that ruins it for everyone else. What bugs me about this character is that almost everyone treats him like crap for no reason, that's funny considering that the actor who plays Pat is the only star on the show. (besides Amy Smart)   

Henry King Jr. is a typical Jock however he isn't a complete jerk. What bugs me about him is he feels bad about what happen to Yolanda despite the fact that it wasn't his fault. Well it's hard to tell because the writers don't even know.  

Cindy Burman is the standard Queen Bee with a punchable face. Later on in the season we see why she's like this and I like her rivalry with Courtney. I wish it would last longer.    

Jordan/Icicle (the main villain) is a complex bad guy. Yes! He does bad things but we see that he does have a heart. It's hard to consider him a villain because his plans can help the world. 

Dr. Henry King/Brainwave (One of the members of IJS.) is scarier than the main villain I mean he's ruthless to the point where he won't let nothing get in the IJS way of their goal. That's my problem with him he shouldn't overshadow the main villain and his motivation is kind of weak. Also I wish he was a bigger threat.  

I like the way this series ended because it would be interesting to see what direction these characters could go in season two. The series has some funny and tender moments. All and all this was a rough around the edge start to this series It would have been better if it focus on the growing pain between Pat and Courtney. Plus have Courtney's hero journey be more difficult. As far as season two goes I might not watch it because it's going to be on the CW, the network that kills superhero shows.     

My Power Rangers Beast Morphers review

My Power Rangers Beast Morphers review 

 

Intro: What the fudge are musicals doing in a power rangers series!?! Take that to Glee or High School musical where it belongs. 

Power Rangers Beast Morphers: This series takes place in the city of Coral Harbor, an Organization called Grid BattleForce has access to the Morphing gird and turn it into a liquid substance called Morph X. They plan on using it to fix the pollution problem, that becomes difficult when a computer virus called Evox infect their computers to get the Morph X. To keep Evok from getting the Morph X Grid BattleForce have to create there own Power Rangers to protect it and the city from this virus. 

This series was a letdown for me, it wasn't bad it's just that I was expecting more for it. I like how this series ends an episode by setting up another conflict or plot point. I'm also fond of the new theme song because it's fast, energetic and short. I'm happy that the red ranger isn't the only one who got a battlizer. This series references the past seasons with plot points and characters. Also seeing a former ranger return that isn't Tommy put a smile on my face because we haven't seen this person in a long time. This series also cleverly address drug addiction. I appreciate that the second half of the series didn't give us the stander holiday episodes instead we get an Olympics episode and a villain's tribute episode. ( I hope this happens more often.) There isn't much to say about this team of rangers because only two of them stood out. Also, why are two of the five rangers based on bugs instead of animals?  

There isn't much to say about Devon the Red Ranger he's a guy who enjoys a challenge. Plus, he's into Martial arts and video games. His father didn't make the best first impression I understand he has his son's best interest in mind however he could have gone about it differently.  

Ravi the Blue Ranger is the strict one of the group who enjoys painting. Despite that, he's conflicted about his ranger duties due to someone he knows working for the villains. I'm not crazy about one episode about him having a temper because it was one-sided.  

Zoey the Yellow Ranger is similar to Shelby and Boom as far as working in a low position and wanting to do more. However, she's not as cool as Shelby or as funny as Boom. She's another character who loves nature but she's subtle about it. We learn that she didn't make that cut as a ranger because she was working at the time I would like to know more about that. I don't buy her romance with one of the rangers because it came out of nowhere. Also, I'm sick of her saying I solve big problems because we don't see her doing enough of that.      

Nate the Gold Ranger is the brains of the team who builds the ranger's zords and weapons. Also, he's arguably the main character of this series, I say that because this season focuses on him. One of the issues I have with him is that he wishes he had a sibling because he barely sees his parents. That's understandable however I don't like how that got resolved because A I thought the Rangers help fill that void and B this series doesn't explore the ups and downs of having a sibling. Plus I was hoping he would be related to a character from the season this series is linked to doing that would help bridge the seasons better. 

Steel the sliver ranger ( that's cute) is the life of the party! He's overconfident and self-centered in a way that doesn't alienate anyone. What bugs me about him is how he makes things awkward for Nate. Another thing how can he be half-human if he's all robot? 

Ben and Betty are siblings who are comic relief characters. They do the same gag throughout the series sometimes it's funny other times it isn't. We learn that their father is the General of Grid BattleForce that explains why they still work there despite all the damage they've done.  

Commander Shaw is the worst mentor in this series I say that because she barely mentors the rangers all she does is give orders. She also comes off as a robot because she has a straight face for the most part. What's the point of her being the blue ranger's mother if it doesn't humanist her or we don't learn anything about her? My grievance with this character is she's a hypocrite, I mean she's against the rangers dating but she has no problem with her son being a ranger under her command huh.   

Evok ( the main villain) is a standard bad guy as far as wanting ultimate power to take over the world. Sadly, he didn't pose much of a challenge to the Rangers after learning his backstory. The only complaint I have with him is that he's too powerful for the Rangers, he might as well fight the rangers with a fly swatter. 

Blaze and Roxy are the Boris and Natasha of this series. They could have been a better foil for the Rangers if they worked together instead of against each other. I'm not crazy about what was done with them in the second half of the season because the writers don't know what to do with them.  

One of the many gripes I have with this series is that it introduces ideas but the creators don't do anything with them. Something tragic happened in the last episode but the creators undermine it, also I don't buy what happened to these characters in that episode. There are serious moments that are ruined due to the tone of this series and the comedy. Three out of the five rangers have kryptonite and the villains didn't explore those weaknesses. What's the point of giving them weaknesses if the writers are not going to do much with them? 

The crossover episodes were disappointing because they feel rushed and out of place. That's a shame considering the build-up to those episodes, heck the crossover episodes from the last series are better than this. I wish I can say that fans would be happy to learn that this season is connected to another Power Rangers series but they won't. The way both seasons tie in together makes no sense, plus this season doesn't hold a candle to that series. This season could have been better if it did the opposite of what that series did. The marketing for this season could have done a better job at letting us know that this is a legacy season. It's hard for me to consider this a Hasbro season because it has Neo-Saban vibes to it, seriously they love doing bodies-switching episodes. Some of the lessons of the week are wasted I mean they did an episode about discipline and the writers dropped the ball with it.  

Overall this season didn't end the Neo-Saban era on a high note, that's too bad because this series could have been a lot better. Hopefully, Hasbro will return this franchise to its former glory.

The flash season 6 review

The flash season 6 review 

Intro: This is going to be awkward, I mean I'm reviewing a season that's three episodes shy from being over. ( Well the production team did film the 20th episode but they won't air it because it's a filler episode, or they didn't finish filming that episode.) The reason why I reviewing this season now is that Mr. Gustin ( The actor who plays Barry Allen/The Flash.) said in an interview that the creators will wrap up the rest of season six in the next season, if he's wrong about that then I will scrap this review and start over. With that said let's get into what I think of this season so far.  

The Flash season six: This season takes place four months after team flash stop cicada from committing mass murder and things have been peaceful. One day the Monitor tells Barry about the upcoming crisis so team Flash prepares for it. After the crisis, Barry learns that the speed force is damaged beyond repair and he's slowly losing his powers. Meanwhile, an organization that weaponizes metahumans called Black Hole is up to no good and someone who was a part of that group wants revenge on them. So Barry has to regain his speed and stop Black Hole before it's too late. 

I'm happy to say that this series gave me a season that I enjoy since this show started. I like how this series set up crisis because it's done in a way that doesn't distract us from the main story. I'm fond of the idea of Barry losing his powers because doing that helps build suspense for this season. The last episode left me wanting to see more from this season. I appreciate that the aftermath of crisis didn't reboot everything that happen in the past six years. I'm happy that the stakes in this season are small because we needed a break from crisis.    

Caitlin takes a backseat this season to give Frost a chance to have a life outside of being the muscle for team flash. This subplot was interrupted because of something the actress did. It's a good thing I'm not her boss because if I was I would reprimand her for it. 

I love what this season has done with Wally West/Kid flash he's basically a zin master. It's a shame that we only get one episode with him and he wasn't in crisis. 

I like what this season has done with Iris West, she now has her own newspaper company called the Central City Citizen.  

Nash Well is an explorer and myth buster. What bothers me about him is the role he plays in crisis, you'll see what I mean when you watch it. Also, his subplot is taking too long to resolve.  

Allegra Garcia is a meta-human with a troubled past, thanks to team flash she's able to turn her life around. I'm annoyed that I don't have a chance to sweep her off her feet. I'm sorry did I say that out loud?

I don't have much to say about Ralph Didny/ Elongated Man all he does this season is work on a case that's connected to black hole. 

Kamilla Hwang is Cisco's love interest who works at the Central City Citizen. The only problem I have with her is that she's too good to be true I mean she's completely understanding about everything with Cisco. I'm not saying that there should be drama between the two however Kamilla shouldn't come off as a robot. 

Eva McCulloch/ Mirror Master (The main villain.) is manipulative, paranoid and merciful. However, you do feel sorry for her after you see what happened to her. One of the many complaints I have with her (besides the gander change.) is that her goal is so small that she could have been a monster of the week. Also, we barely see her and the flash faces each other because Eva manages to keep a low profile. 

The biggest problem with this season is the downside of the last episode, it left things unresolved. I don't like how this season handles Godspeed, if you know who him from the comic you'll understand why. This series treats him like a side villain. Really he shouldn't be in this series because we already had a speedster who considers himself a GOD and that's Savitar. The drama of Barry dying in crisis amount to nothing because that didn't happen. (Don't you dare say I spoiled it for you, you had 5 months to watch that crossover.) This season could have been better if it didn't have too many characters, plus the show didn't do much with them. Another thing that would help this season is it should have been about Barry/the Flash dealing with the aftermath of the crisis, the show did do that however it wasn't the main focus. This season gives us a hint to how Barry is going to fix his powers and it's lame and cheesy. I mean on a Power Rangers level. 

This season may not be as good as the first season or better than the rest of the series however it's easier to watch. I would recommend this if you enjoy this show overall.   

    

My thoughts on Star Wars the Clone Wars series

My thoughts on Star Wars the Clone Wars series

It's a miracle that this show worked out because there are so many things working against it. First of all, this is a show about war how can you take a war and make it kid-friendly? Did you forget about how uptight parents are about kids being exposed to violence? That's like making the Horror genre appeal to kids. 

                                             

OK, that wasn't the best example, but you know what I mean. 

Another reason why I'm not crazy about this series going in the family-friendly direction is because doing that will undermine how the war was described in the Episode 3 novelization. In that novel the war took its toll on the Jedi, the Republic struggled to win battles and this war played a role in why Anakin turned to the dark side? Heck, the Battlefront 2 video game from 2005 reinforces this. Second, what's wrong with the Clone Wars micro-series we got in 2003? Third I don't like the idea of Anakin having a padawan, do I really have to explain why? Finally, the tie-in movie didn't make the best first impression. I have one good thing to say about that movie and that is the story is easy to follow. 

With all that said this show is overrated. I don't consider this the best thing that came out of the prequels along with the games and Novels. This is one of those shows that has filler episodes and multiple story arcs that are separate from each other. We do get references to past episodes but the events in those episodes have no payoff in this series. You will notice that some of the episodes didn't air in order, did anyone learn anything from Firefly? Some of these story arcs could have been better if they had more episodes and others could benefit from fewer episodes. We have episodes that are centered on Jar Jar Binks, don't worry there is a handful of them. Each episode has a lesson of the week but how the episode plays out contradicts that lesson. 

Another problem I have with this series is that it's hard to be invested in this war because we don't know who has the upper hand? I was let down by the lightsaber fights not because they were bad it's because no limbs were cut off.  I'm disappointed that we didn't get the unfinished episodes, I mean I saw them on the internet but they're not a part of season 7. Speaking of episodes some episodes are either stupid or make the characters look stupid. For example, the Jedi learn about Order 66 and yet they play alone with it why!?! There is a story arc where the clones are under the command of General Krell and they're complaining about it because more clones died under his command. Are you kidding me? You're clones you were created to fight this war what difference does it make that Krell put your lives in danger on purpose or not? 

The way this series ended bothers me because it connects to episode 3. This show is too different from episode 3 to be connected to it. This series is lazy with some of the character designs, they look the same as the 2003 series. I'm not crazy about the creative liberties this series takes with the EU because they are a joke. Plus, that creates world-building that's separate from the movies. It's hard to appreciate that this show tried to fix the prequels because it doesn't affect the movies. The politics in this show left more to be desired. The Jedi are not noble in this war I mean they committed war crimes to win the battles like raising the white flag as a bait and switch, child soldiers, funding insurgents, not knowing what to do with the clones after the war and using certain weapons. Let me get this straight the Jedi have no problem with doing the things I mentioned but they have a problem with killing OK.   

Anakin Skywalker is confident, cocky at times and eager to go into battle. We see that he's having a hard time struggling with letting people go to the point where he's willing to sacrifice lives and kill to save his loved ones. We also see that he's frustrated with the Jedi council and that plays a role in him turning to the dark side. One of the reasons why I'm not crazy about him having a padawan is because he isn't mature enough to have one. Plus, he's also a rule-breaker. However, I do like that she shows Obi-Wan how much of a handful she is when Anakin was Obi-Wans Padawan. I would prefer that he becomes a Knight in the series doing that would give him some character development. When Anakin mentors her it's disingenuous because he's still having a hard time dealing with attachments and loss. What was Yoda thinking giving him a padawan?   

Obi-Wan is a gentleman who tells corny jokes. Like Anakin, there are times where he struggles with the dark side of the force. His relationship with Anakin is much better in this series however I still don't buy that they're friends because Obi-Wan has authority over him. Plus, all we get is banter from them. also, I don't like that this show gave him a girlfriend because he follows the Jedi code to the letter.  

Padme is like her daughter as far as being outspoken, resourceful and fierce.

Capt. Rex is Anakin's right-hand man, he's a loyal soldier who values the lives of his clone brothers above anything else. He also values experience more than static, talks about strategists with the Jedi, and realizes that following orders is not always the best thing. The situation he was put in in the last episode was sad, you'll see what I mean when you watch that episode. 

I can't talk about the rest of the clone troopers because that will take me all day to do.    

Ahsoka Tano became a fan favorite over time to the point where she will be a part of another Star Wars series. She was wisecracking and stubborn but she's also kind-hearted. What bugs me about her (Besides her being too young to fight a war.) is she was too much in the last story arc, you'll see what I mean when you watch it. I understand what the writers tried to do with her in the arc with the two sisters however it could have been done better. I don't get why she's so popular despite her character growth.        

This series hasn't done anything new with Count Dracula I mean Count Dooku, he's still as bland as he was in the movies. That's what annoys me about this series, I mean why have him in this cartoon if we don't learn anything about him? Why is his head shaped like a banana?   

General Grievous is more or less the same as he was in the movie. That's sad because he was threatening in the 2003 series. 

Asajj Ventress is a short-tempered assassin of Count Dooku, despite that she can be clever. Also is it me or does she have a seductive voice?

Cab Bane is a by-the-book bounty hunter, he's ruthless and resourceful. It's too bad that Boba Fett wasn't like this. Speaking of Boba Fett we were suppose to get an episode of him and Bane working together but that didn't happen.    

This show gave Darth Maul justice, he's a lot smarter than we thought and he has ambition. You'll feel sorry for him we you learn his backstory. The only thing that bothers me about him is that he shouldn't survived being cut in half!!!  

The Battle Droids are the comic relief of the show.

The episodes that focus on the clones are the best ones in this series because they were created for this war. Plus, we get to see how this war affects them and how they feel about it? Speaking of episodes some episodes can fit into almost every genre. Also, I'm surprised at how violent this show can get, we got better characterization of characters and the CGI improves over time. I enjoyed some of these story arcs.              

Overall, this is not a good series you're better off reading the Star Wars Republic comics. I would recommend it if you want to see elements from the Star Wars EU.    

My thoughts on the last of us 2 backlash

My thoughts on the last of us 2 backlash

 

Warning if you haven't played the first game and don't want this one spoiled for you then don't read this post. 

I don't remember the last time a video game got so much controversy. ( Besides MK and GTA.)  First people complain about Ellie being a lesbian, this game having a multiplayer and now people are upset with the leaks to how the story in this game will play out. Can someone please help me understand why people have a problem with what will happen in part 2? Before I talk about that I have to talk about the story in the first game. I wasn't interested in this game at first because it was a zombie apocalypse story, I don't find that genre appealing. The thing I like about this game is how it told its story from the survivor's perspective, If The Walking Dead is anything like this I would give that show a chance. The game reminds me of Logan or The Terminator.  

Originally the premise for this game was only women were infected by the virus that turn people into the infected, that changed after Mr. Druckmann (The writer of the game.) was inspired by Anita Sarkeesian of all people. Man, I wish I was making that up. After she helped him realize that he's alienating women by making them the only ones to be infected by the virus he alter the story so the virus can affect everyone. I hate to say it but I have to thank Ms. Sarkeesian ( I throw up after saying that.) for helping him make this change because doing that creates a social commentary on the ugly side of mankind. I mean in this game's world it's a free-for-all, imagine inmates running free doing whatever they want with no consequences that's how things are in this game. Because the world is so messed up women have to become men to survive in this world, as far as doing almost everything a man would do. This is what made Ellie sympathetic because she doesn't know what it's like to be a girl, when she does get an idea of what that's like it's foreign to her. It's almost a shame that this wasn't adapted into a movie because if this movie doesn't make feminists appreciate men more I don't know what will.         

One of the complaints people have towards part 2 is that Joel is not going to be a playable character because he died in that game. People shouldn't have an issue with this because first of all, he's not the main character in this game Ellie is. The plot of the first game is about taking her to the fireflies because she can help fix the infection, without her you have no story. Second, there's a point in the game where you play as her and she has a DLC. Finally, Joel was suppose to die in the original concept of the game and Ellie had to learn how to survive on her own. I don't understand why people are bothered by not being able to play him after what he did in that last game. When Ellie is delivered to the fireflies Joel learns that doctors are going to perform surgery on her to find a cure but she won't survive the surgery. After learning that Joel kills the doctors, took Ellie away, and lied to her about what happened, our hero ladies and gentlemen. Before you say that he loves her like a daughter save it, if that's true then he would want things to be better for her. Joel made his daughter's death be in vain because of this. 

Instead of playing as Joel or Ellie in part 2, you'll play as Abby, she's the daughter of one of the doctors Joel murdered at the Fireflies base. This is what people are upset about that they're playing a character who ends up killing both Joel and Ellie out of revenge. So Joel saving Ellie at the end of the first game was also in vein great just great. Playing a character who will kill Joel and Ellie bothers them so much that they don't want to buy the game. People think this is bad fan fiction because doing this makes Joel and Ellie look like villains. First of all, Joel made himself the villain, he killed doctors in cold blood and sacrificed the whole world just because he wouldn't let go of Ellie. Does that sound heroic to any of you? Also, the first game foreshadows that this could happen so why are people surprised by this? Second I'm glad the story is going in this direction where's the fun in playing a game if you know it's going to have a happy ending? Like I said the story is about the worse side of mankind. If you want to be an independent person this is what it looks like you are responsible for your own safety at the end of the day. Finally, there are games where you play as the bad guy how is this any different? 

That's all I have to say about this game for now. I can understand why fans are bothered by this I mean the trailers didn't give us the idea that the story is going to be a revenge story. However just because you know what's going to happen doesn't always mean the game is going to be bad this isn't a movie.