Superman and Lois season 2 review
I know a good movie, tv show and video game when I see one 8 times out of ten.
Pages
Wednesday, June 29, 2022
Superman and Lois season 2 review
Friday, June 17, 2022
My review of Lightyear
My review of Lightyear
Monday, June 6, 2022
My Jurassic World Trilogy review
I consider this movie to be a proper sequel to the first movie. What bothers me about the last two films is that they feel like side stories that didn't do much to push the story forward, that's not the case here. The movie expands on the questions and themes from the first film by putting them into practice. The movie also captures what we love about the first film by paying homage to it without it feeling like the same movie. That was a smart move because it helps the movie be a shared experience for fans and newcomers. The movie is kind of self-aware I mean it makes fun of marketing, sequels and it even took a jab at JP3. The CGI and the resort are a huge improvement over what the first film did. I like the Indominus Rex because of how dangerous this creature is. The Indominus Rex doesn't just pose a threat to the tourist but to the other dinosaurs as well. I'm fond of the Velociraptors in this movie because they're used to explore the theme of control over nature.
Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom: The movie takes place three years after the events in the last movie and the resort has been shut down since then. One day the public learn that the volcano on Isla Nublar has become active and it could wipe out the dinosaurs. While world leaders are discussing what they should do about the dinosaurs, Claire takes it upon herself to get the dinosaurs off the island with the help of Owen and someone from John Hammond's past. That becomes difficult because of a conspiracy involving the dinosaurs, so Claire and Owen have to figure out what that is.
Tuesday, May 31, 2022
My rant about mass shootings
My rant about mass shootings
Intro: OK I didn’t want to talk about this because A I don’t have much
to say about this topic. Plus, I covered bits and pieces of this in my other
posts. B people in power don’t seem to take this seriously. The reason why I’m
talking about this is because of the suggestion that was made to fix this
issue.
In case you don’t watch the news or live in the wilderness
there has been two mass shooting this month. One happened at a supermarket in Buffalo
New York and the other happened at an elementary school in Texas. The reason
why I mentioned that people in power are not taking this seriously is that they love to blame video games for this. Do I really have to make fun of them
for doing that? You know what you shouldn’t have any authority if you think
video games are the blame for everything. Not only that they are making it hard
for citizens to carry firearms with gun control and background checks. The second
amendment is the right to bear arms without the Government infringing on that
right. I don't see the point in background checks, I mean anyone can lose their minds and most gun owners are not crazy. You can’t have it both ways you can’t say that we can’t rely on law enforcement
and then take issue with the citizens arming themselves. How the police handled the elementary school shooting reinforces that.
Since we’re on the subject I think it’s messed up that the eighteen-year-old
can’t buy a gun. I mean they're old enough to join the Army and live on their own, but they can't buy a gun what gives? This should be a package deal either they are old
enough for all three things or none of them at all. I hope congress won’t raise
the age for all three things because that could create another problem. Being
old enough for something is one thing mature enough that’s something else. Adults have moments where they act like fools. Why do I need to be mentally evaluated to have a God-given right? Why
won’t people talk about bullying? I mean that’s one of the characteristics of a
school shooter. If you think it’s acceptable for kids to be subjected to humiliation
and bodily harm, then you shouldn’t make a big deal about this or kids being molested
by their teachers. What are the fundamental differences between these three things?
Really, I’m surprised that we still have this problem, I mean this has been going on for 15 years and I thought we profile the shooters. Last I checked they are the type of people who keep to themselves, immature, socially awkward and neglected by their parents. This is one of the reasons why it’s hard for me to take these shootings seriously because I’m the type of person that keeps to himself and people are still starting trouble with me. The other reason is that this is the down side of advocating for people owning guns unfortunately. I mean you can't say you want the right to firearm and then complain when this happens. That makes you indirectly responsible for mass shootings. The same thing goes with alcohol, if you like to go to bar or night clubs you don't get to complain about DUI.
I don’t
mind profiling shooters as long as you don’t single people out for having those
traits because that could make things worse. Instead of doing that we should be
helping them work past or through that stigma. I would like to know why we have
this problem because there was a time when we can have a rifle outside of the
school and we use to teach our youth how to use guns depending on where they lived.
Now we are number one for most school shootings how did this happen?
Now there are people talking about hardening the schools and
having the teachers carry a gun. I’m not crazy about this idea. I know I asked
why we don’t protect kids the way we protect money however I don’t think the
ends justify the means. Also, we might be manipulated into going in this direction.
I say that because there is more going on with the Buffalo shooting than the
news is telling us. Look up Aaron Salter and you’ll see what I mean. Another
thing this suggestion makes us look like hypocrites. I mean people are thin
skin now because they don’t want to step out of their comfort zone because it
makes them feel safe. So, staying in a bubble is harmful to your development but
it’s OK to put them in a bubble to keep kids safe. (To be fair we put criminals
and mentally ill people in a bubble so maybe that wasn’t the best argument.)
How is doing this going to put the kid’s minds at ease? If you saw the
interviews with the surviving children, they are afraid of guns how is putting
them in a place full of them going to make them move past their ordeal?
Public Schools are already a prison you don’t think turning them onto one is going to make things worse? What about teens? We all know how testy they are what if they get in a fight with one of the teachers and the teacher shoots and kill the student in self-defense would you be OK with that? Guns are not the only thing you can use to kill people how will you guard against pencils and scissors? Look I’m not saying we shouldn’t lower the risks of this happening however parents need to do a better job at coming to terms with the fact that their kids will be exposed to the ugly side of life. Also, watching your kids grow up is a luxury we wouldn’t have the sex trafficking ring and kids dying of leukemia if that wasn’t the care. Plus, we don't want to risk alienating each other by projecting our fears onto each other. Another thing what about people who work at fast-food you don't think they need protection? That’s all I have to say about this subject for now.
P.S. If you can stomach what a shotgun can do to the human body then you shouldn't want one.
Wednesday, May 4, 2022
My thoughts on the Star Wars Sequel Trilogy
My thoughts on the Star Wars Sequel Trilogy
Intro: OK I will try to keep this short and sweet because I know I'm beating a dead horse. Plus, I wanted to wait for everyone to air out their grievances with this trilogy before I do.
wish he was with Fin and Rey in the first movie. I mean wasn't the point of having three new leads if we barely see them together? We learn that he wasn't always an upstanding guy in the last movie but that amounts to nothing. In the second film, the writers tried to give him an arc of knowing when to lead and when to follow. The problem with that arc is that it wasn't done well. Leia demotes Poe for going against her order then later on she lets him back in the field. After Leia is in the hospital Gen. Holdo takes her place and all we get is them bickering over her plan until Leia gets back. After their back and forth, she gives him a backhanded complaint saying she likes him What the fudge!?!
last two films. Even the actor who plays this character wasn't happy with what was done to this character. I would be outraged too because it seems like the marketing pulled a bait-and-switch on us with this character. Fin starts off as a stormtrooper who somehow breaks free from his condition. After that, he helps Poe escape the first order so that he can get as far away from them as he can. After meeting Rey and forming a bond with her he develops to courage to stand up to the first order. In The Last Jedi, the writers hit the reset button with this character. (I still can't get over how fast he was able to recover from getting hit in the spine with a Lightsaber.) The subplot of him and Rose is insulting because it serves as a PSA on how bad war is. Considering what's going on between Russia and Ukraine that part of the movie didn't age well. He's face-off with Capt. Phasma was a joke. In the rise of Skywalker, all he does is shout Rey! and try to tell her that he loves her. How this trilogy handled this character makes me sick because he could have worked as the main character.
Thursday, April 14, 2022
My review of the legend of Korra
My review of the legend of Korra
Monday, April 4, 2022
My Sonic the Hedgehog 2 review
My Sonic the Hedgehog 2 review
Monday, March 21, 2022
My thoughts on the Halo series
My thoughts on the Halo series
After nine years of waiting were finally getting a Halo series, it’s too bad that it doesn’t mean a darn thing! Also, do we really need a Halo movie? I mean Star Wars Rouge One is similar to Halo Reach. The more we learn about the show the less interested fans are going to watch it. We were told three things about this series first thing is the show is not based on canon, it takes place in a different timeline. Second, Master Chief will take off his helmet. Finally, the people who worked on the series didn’t play the games. You can tell that the creative team is not familiar with this franchise because the actor who's playing Master Chief doesn't sound like him and this franchise doesn’t deal with time paradox or multiverse. This franchise has gone downhill after 343 industries took over this franchise. (I wouldn't have minded Halo 4 telling a personal story if it didn't come at the expense of this franchise; that game felt like fan fiction.) How is alienating the fanbase going to help boost morale? Look, I’m not trying to discourage creativity however Hollywood didn’t earn the right to do that with this franchise. These adaptations are pushing thirty years old and Hollywood is not batting a thousand when it comes to them.
I understand why writers would come up with an original story and attach it to a well-known franchise as a way to get people to watch it.
However, it makes no sense to do that here I mean Sci-Fi is a popular genre. The creators have no reason not to play any of the games, how can you make a show about them if you don’t know anything about the games? You don’t think that would make you look stupid? The games and outside sources can work as movies or TV Shows. For example, the only Halo book I read was First Strike and that can work as a movie, so what’s the problem?
As far as Master Chief taking off his helmet, I can be fixable with this. I wouldn’t mind this if it’s done in a meaningful way and the scene was shot where the characters can see his face but the viewers can’t. I hope it’s not done too often because his armor doesn’t work without his helmet. We don’t need to see his face to know what he’s thinking or feeling, if Darth Vader can get away with it why can’t this character? I’m going to address some of the things that bothered me about the trailers. In this series Master Chief and the other Spartans are created to fight a war against the covenant I’m guessing. The Spartans were not created to fight a war they were created to protect the UNSC from rebels. I don’t know what’s more ridiculous Master Chief being able to fight off two Elites or Batman being able to fight two Predators.
Also,
how can the UNSC be at war with the covenant when they are at odds with the scientist?
Speaking of scientists Dr. Halsey doesn’t look good the same thing goes for
Cortana. We also see a human allying herself with the covenant how is that possible!?! We saw the Elite slander a bunch of humans in the trailer what’s going on
here!?! The only explanation I can think of is that there is division among them, or the woman is not human. I hope she doesn't replace the Arbiter. Another thing there is a girl in this series that
fans think the show will be centered on her. Considering how Hollywood throws men
under the bus to make women look good this wouldn’t surprise me.
In closing, this show is doomed to fail. That’s a shame because it has good production value if only the budget when to the writers. This might appeal to the general public, but it will rub fans the wrong way.
Monday, March 14, 2022
My thought on the difficulty in video games
My thought on the difficulty in video games
For those of you who don’t play video games, there has been people and so-call gaming journalist complaining about video games being too hard lately. To be fair this has been going on for the past five or six years and I hope it would stop. First, it was Dark Souls then Metroid Dread and now Elden Rings. Of course, like most of the gaming community, I brush it off as them being lazy, entitled, afraid of fomo or they want to be a completionist. The gaming community even started a hashtag # get good and I respond to them by saying play a telltale game.
Heck game developers pop fun at us for playing games on easy mode.

I feel bad for jumping on people who complain about this without seeing if this is a topic worth talking about. Plus, there is something I didn’t consider and that’s player expression. Also, I’m just tired of people expecting everyone to include them in everything. There is a right way and a wrong way to do hard mode in video games. When hard mode is done right it causes you to think of ways to beat the boss or complete your objective. It encourages you to be familiar with the game’s mechanics and know when to use them. For example, there is a level in Crash Bandicoot where you have to reach the end of a broken bridge without falling. You can do this by timing your jumps or using the ropes. Another example is GM mode in the Smackdown vs Raw games. The goal in that mode is to win General Manager of the year award. In order to do that you have to keep the rating high and that's no simple task.
When it’s done wrong, it feels like the game is testing your patients instead of having you think. (I'm not saying that a difficult game shouldn't test your patients but there should be a limit.) This is the problem I have with the Halo games whenever I play them on Legendary mode, I feel like I’m being handicapped. The enemy A.I. has increased health and can do more damage when they hit you. Because of that I barely got past the first wave of enemies because I use most of my ammo on one of them. Playing Halo involves strategy as far as you have to prioritize which alien are you going to kill first? By making them OP you took the fun away and now the game has become a chore. I heard when you play a certain mode in the Destiny games, your equipment is limited and you have to play the game a certain way. If that's true, then that's hurting the player expression. That's why I don't like trophies in games because they are telling me how to play the game instead of letting me play the game how I want to play it.
Despite my enjoyment of Pac-Man, it's one of the hardest games to beat for me. The reason why is because whenever you beat a level the ghost move faster and the power Pac’s last shorter. Memorizing the ghost movement patterns doesn't mean anything if you don’t have the reflexes to match. I’m not saying that this hurt the game however I can understand why other people would feel differently. Another thing that annoys me about playing games on hard mode is that when you died you have to start all over again as far as regain your collectibles and stats. (Well, that depends on what you're playing.) This is why platform games like Mega Man and Crash Bandicoot don't need hard modes because they become difficult as you progress through the game and you become familiar with the controls. They do the same thing with racing games, once you're familiar with the controls the tracks become harder and the time limit is shorter.
There are some games where hard mode is ridiculous. For example, the hard mode in NBA 2K2 is an invisible wall when the A.I. is playing defense. I’m not kidding about that why was this game popular at the time? Star Wars Bounty Hunter doesn’t have a hard mode, but that game has tasks that can be hard to achieve like collecting bounties. I mean it’s hard to get certain ones because the target is in the middle of a shootout, and you don’t have enough time to decide if you want the target dead or alive? When playing a wrestling game as a cruiserweight going up against a heavyweight, there isn't much you can do against him besides outmaneuvering your opponent. (Well, that depends on which game you're playing.) Don't get me started on the Xbox 360 version of Iron Man.
Yes! Hard mode in games can make or break those games especially if the game is broken. When you beat a game on hard mode you should feel like you accomplish something by overcoming the challenge not rejoicing that you finally beat the game and hope you never play it again. Then again easy mode can hurt the game as well, I mean if the game is too easy you have no incentive to explore the game. When it comes to Dark Souls and Elden Rings I hear people complain that those games have no maps, no indicator that tells you when an enemy is going to hit you, the game doesn't drop hits and you can't tell if you're fighting the final boss.
Where was this complaint when it comes to the Legend of Zelda games? I mean some of the Zelda games are like this. Also, Pokémon games don't have maps either. I can understand why those games bug you if you're bad at backtracking. Also, there's a difference between holding your hand and pointing you in the right direction. Going back to Legend of Zelda those games have maps that you have to find and drop hits on where you should go but you still have to do the work. Those games don't tell you where you can find all the easter eggs or collectibles. (Well, that depends on the NPC you talk to in the game.) I struggle with finding all the pieces of heart but that didn't ruin the game for me. That was my gripe with Skyward Sword, I mean you start with six hearts instead of three, but I digress.
Just because a game is too hard for you it doesn't mean that there's something wrong with the game or you. All games are not the same and there not made for everyone. Also watching other people beat the game on twitch is not that helpful, I mean you can’t accomplish things in life just by watching others do it for the most part. People complaining about games being too difficult shouldn't be an issue as long as you can articular your points. When you don't you get videos like that girl on TikTok saying all games need easy mode.
See what I mean? RPGs don't need an easy mode because you can raise your stats to make the game easier for you. Just because playing games is not a priority for you that doesn't mean game developers should make it easy for you. Just because most gamers are minors doesn't help your case. There are people who work and still make time to play games so what is she talking about? If you want to see a story play the last of us or a telltale game. That's all I have to say about this subject for now.
P.S. This is something Frosk could have talked about.








