My Spider-Man rant

 My Spider-Man rant 

Intro: Forgive me if you find this post underwhelming because I will be focusing on one thing involving this character. I might go off-topic in this rant; I have to do that to make my point. I can't talk about this character without talking about the impact he made on people, or lack thereof. 

I don't have anything new to say about this character that's already been said. Really, it's a miracle that this character is well-known to the public. The reason I said that is because the late Stan Lee's editor at the time was against Spider-Man because no one likes spiders. Then again, no one likes Bats, and Batman is a hit, so was that a fair argument? I consider this character Marvel's Superman more than Captain America. The reason why is because he's not put in a position to kill people, unlike Capt. Both of them also struggle with balancing being a hero with their personal life. I like the moments this character deals with bullies in the Amazing Spider-Man and Ultimate Spider-Man; he either fights back against them or speaks up for himself. I just wish he would do it more often.  

Spider-Man is one of the few comic book characters that became successful outside the comics with cartoons and video games. Sidenote; it's a shame that other Marvel characters couldn't succeed in cartoons and video games. Don't get me wrong, we had some success with the Hulk, X-Men, Iron Man, and Captain America, but no one capitalized on them. I'm surprised that Spider-Man PS4 was a hit because the Amazing Spider-Man tie-in game and Web of Shadows told the same story. As far as stopping an infection from spreading. Despite that, I enjoy the cartoons and video games. The live-action movies are a different story. Before I get into that, I want to address two things about the Spider-Man mythos that annoy me. 

But first, I want to address the fans; they should be ashamed of themselves over how they reacted to the PS5 remastering of Spider-Man PS4. If I were in charge of making the next Spider-Man game, I would tell my employees to stop working on the game until I see a compilation of the fans on their hands and knees apologizing to Insomniac. There is no reason for them to react that way over something so small. Do I really have to comment on the controversy around the Spider-Man Lotus fan film? We've all done things that we are not proud of; if you can't forgive someone, then you should be canceled. (To be fair, I can understand why people have a hard time with forgiveness because of suicidal empathy; however, that's not the case here.) That's my problem with cancel culture; it's disingenuous. If everyone's life were public, we wouldn't have cancel culture because we're all guilty of doing something like this or worse. 

I don't know about you, but I'm sick and tired of the "with great power comes great responsibility" quote. (This is another reason why I consider this character Marvel's Superman. Does this sound like something Superman would say?) Not because I disagree with it, it's because responsibility is a double-edged sword, and people don't talk about that enough. For example, Bruce Wayne watching his parents get murdered didn't turn him into Batman; he did that to himself. Let me put it like this, if someone shot you, are you going to wait for the shooter to treat your wound, or are you going to call 911? If the answer is to call 911, then that's my point. It's not Bruce's fault that his parents were murdered, but he's responsible for how he deals with it. You can't dedicate your life to fighting crime and then expect people to feel sorry for you that you don't have a life outside of that. The same goes for the Punisher; you can't commit mass murder and expect sympathy from anyone. There are better ways of coping. 

I don't understand how this character made such an impact on pop culture when people don't accept responsibility for anything. People in power don't take responsibility for creating resentment, segregation, and promoting or encouraging terrorism with a might makes right mentality. Parents and society are pointing the finger at each other instead of taking responsibility for why the youth is acting up. Law Enforcement doesn't take responsibility for why the public doesn't trust them. No one is taking responsibility for COVID-19, or why public schools are going down the toilet. (Well, that depends on where you live.) Casual gamers are not taking responsibility for why they suck at Elden Rings. Women don't take responsibility for why men don't want to put a ring on it. How are we holding the shooter's feet to the fire when we blame mental health for why they do it? The list goes on and on; that quote will lose its meaning if we keep this up. I would like to see a Spider-Man movie that deals with different aspects of responsibility. For example, is there such a thing as taking too much responsibility? 

If the answer is yes, then where does the line draw? 

This is what bothers me about the Hulk movies and TV shows. Why have a character that can turn green when he's angry if you're not going to explore different aspects of that emotion? Miles Morales is another thing that bugs me about the Spider-Man mythos. I don't like this character, not because he's a bad character, it's because he's a copy of Peter Parker. I know Spider-Man into the Spider-verse changed some aspects of the character, but that doesn't change the fact that he's the same character as Peter, but with a different look. Now I wouldn't have minded that if he were from a different universe where he got bitten by the spider instead of Peter. Speaking of Miles, what's going on with him? I mean, first the writers made him evil, then you turn him into Thor, and now the Hulk. I don't get it why create a new character if the writers are not going to separate him from Peter? This leads to another issue I have with Spider-Man, which is having different versions of the same character. When writers do that, you reduce Spider-Man to a mantel. Turing Spider-Man into a mantel takes away from what makes Peter Parker Spider-Man in the first place. Legacy characters are one of the many problems I have with comic books in general. 

I mean, where's the value in these characters if anyone can be them? 

How is this any different from giving people who participate in the Olympics a gold medal? The gold medal loses its value when you do that. Look, I don't mind someone else being Iron Man or Captain America if it's for a short time and if that person doesn't have the same backstory as the character that they're filling in for. The only exceptions to this are the Nova Corps and Black Panther. because they are space police, and the Black Panther is a mantle that's been passed down from generation to generation.  

In case you didn't read my reviews of the Spider-Man films, I didn't like most of them. We had three actors who played Peter Parker/Spider-Man, and none of them embraced this character, in my opinion. The reason why I feel this way is because none of them display how smart Peter Parker is or how funny Spider-Man can be. Tom Holland was more sarcastic in the Uncharted movie than he was as Spider-Man; that's saying a lot. I'm not saying he didn't make jokes as Spider-Man, but most of it is pop culture references. 

Sadly,  J Jonah Jameson is the only character Hollywood got right. I'm sorry, I do like Aunt May from the Raimi films, Uncle Ben, and Harry Osborn from the Amazing films. I would be surprised if we don't get a movie where JJ Jameson's son becomes Manwolf or JJ Jameson fall from grace trying to discredit Spider-Man by using Scorpion. Another thing that bugs me about these three is that most of the bad guys know Peter is Spider-Man. This wouldn't have happened if they had kept their mask on!!! To be fair, some of them figured it out, but that doesn't change the fact that Peter should be more careful with keeping his identity a secret. The Green Goblin is the only character who knows that Peter is Spider-Man in the comics, as far as I know. 

I didn't watch No Way Home because the writers wasted that movie to give us a sinister six movie. (I mean five.) That's a shame because that movie could have been good if the writers had focused on Peter dealing with the stress of everyone knowing he's Spider-Man and clearing his name. Doing that would make up for Marvel Studios not adapting that part of the Civil War comic book in their Civil War movie. In that comic, Peter not only has to deal with everyone knowing he's Spider-Man, he's conflicted about being on the right side of the registration act. This is what Spider-Man comics do; they tell stories about the internal conflict first and the external conflict second. I'm I the only one who finds it insulting that No Way Home tried to hide the fact that the other two Spider-Men are in this movie? I mean, this is the worst-kept secret since Star Trek into Darkness. I feel bad for Tom Holland because he never got a chance to carry a film. First, he was overshadowed by RDJ, and now he'll be overlooked by nostalgia bait. What's the point of casting him to play this character if Marvel Studios has no confidence that he can stand on his own? 

The villains are another thing that hurt these movies for me; most of them are not written well. Because of that, most of them feel like the villain of the week. It's a shame that The Amazing Spider-Man films didn't work out because both films were overshadowed by their competition. I don't know what Sony was thinking, trying to build a cinematic universe with Spider-Man alone. I can understand making a spin-off film or two, but a whole universe, really? After seeing the plans Sony had for this universe, I'm glad that it was discontinued. Well, something must have happened between then and now because Sony is making solo films of Spider-Man villains. I don't plan on watching them for reasons I explained in my villain's rant. Also, I don't see the point in these movies. I mean, what's the endgame? If this is what Sony's Spider-Verse looks like, then I'm not impressed. Wait! Why am I talking about universes? I thought that's what into the Spider-Verse was doing, so why do we need another one? Making a Spider-Verse is a mistake because, first of all, there are not enough interesting characters to justify this universe's existence. 

Second, the Spider-Men and women's abilities are not different enough to where they can stand out. 

How is this any different from giving each Power Ranger a solo movie? If anyone should get a solo movie is Agent Venom. That's saying a lot because I find Flash Thompson/Agent Venom annoying. I mean, you don't get to torment Peter and then be an anti-hero, screw you. He also gives him backhanded compliments outside the comics. Do you see why I find this character so aggravating? For this movie to work, Peter has to beat the crap out of Flash to the point where Flash is sent to the trauma room. After that, Peter visits him because he feels bad about how badly he beat him up, and they both reconcile. After that, it's all she wrote. 

As far as suggestions for future movies goes, hire people who care about this I.P., and the studio needs to stop undermining the director. With that said, I would like to see a story around an older Peter Parker because we got bits and pieces of what an older Spider-Man could look like in Spider-Man PS4 and into the Spider-Verse movie. Also, I'm getting tired of seeing him in a high school setting. That's saying a lot considering these movies haven't done much with this character in that setting. Seriously, who asked for a series of his freshman year? Now I wouldn't have minded that if the writers had added nuance to Peter being in high school. I would be interested in seeing unscheduled stop get adapted into a movie. We don't get a lot of superhero movies that are limited to two or three locations. 

Also, have Black Cat as a love interest for Spider-Man. It could be hard to bring her into the films because people will compare her to Catwoman. She would create an interesting love triangle. I say that because when Spider-Man reveals that he's Peter Parker, she wasn't happy about it. I know this has been done before; however, it wasn't done well. I like how this character was used in the Spider-Man 2 video game, because she boosts Peter's morale to be Spider-Man and causes Peter to have to choose between someone he loves vs someone Spider-Man loves. 

I would also like to see a Spider-Man movie with him, Black Cat, Anti-Venom, Agent Venom, and Harry Osborn as the Green Goblin. Having those characters would create an intreating dynamic considering that they all know each other. Another thing Hollywood should take notes on how Spider-Man PS4 took creative liberties with the source material. That game did it in a way that it still feels like Spider-Man for the most part. I mean, I'm not crazy about MJ being a Lois Lane clone, or Harry could be Venom.

That's all I have to say about this topic, for now. What do you think of the movies and what direction should they take?             

Superman and Lois season 2 review

 Superman and Lois season 2 review 

 

Intro: I hope the writers won't make the same mistake as the Flash writers. 

Superman and Lois season two: This season takes place three months after the events of last season and Smallville manages to get back to normal. Until someone from Lois's past shows up in Smallville and she has plans that will endanger everyone. So, Superman and Lois have to stop her before it's too late. 

This season is similar to last season but not as good. Part of the reason why is because there are so many subplots where all of them don't get resolved or they drag out. Yes! The first season did this, but they weren't stretched so thin. It's hard to appreciate the stake in this season because the writers didn't do a good job of reinforcing the consequences if the villain achieves her goal. The climax is also ridiculous because it opens up a can of worms about Superman's abilities. Basically, this season reinforces the things people didn't like about season one like family drama and side characters. The series also suffers from plot holes and some of the effects stand out like a sore thumb. The themes of this season are secrets and redemption. This season deals with how secrets can hurt relationships, but the creators drop the ball with handling the redemption theme.   

Besides having an arc on being a better father this season hasn't done much with Clark/Superman. I don't like that he's not doing anything for money as far as we know because that's going to create problems. 

Lois Lane has a lot of family baggage this season. I mean she still has issues with her father, mother and now her sister because of her connection to the big bad. The only complaint I have with her is that there was suppose to be a subplot of her building a relationship with Nat (John Henry Irons's daughter.) but the writer ignores that. Also, both her and Clark can be narrow-minded over what Johnathan did.  

This season hasn't done anything new with Jordan besides the creator taking steps to him becoming superboy. I would like to know why he stops playing football? 

Johnathan is still dealing with insecurities about fitting in Smallville. What annoys me about this character is that he did something that got him in a lot of trouble and the writers didn't stick to him dealing with the consequences of his actions what the fudge? 

Nat is a bright and mature girl. Like Jordan, she too is taking steps to help her father in the field. My gripe with her is she's out of line for telling her father how he should go through the grieving process.            

I don't know how I feel about Sarah because she did two things to Jordan that's messed up. OK, the first thing is understandable to a degree, but the second thing doesn't make her look like a good girlfriend.  

Lane Lang is running for Mayor of Smallville against a shady candidate and we see how this election will affect her family. 

Sam Lane just provided emotional support for Lois and her sister Lucy in this season. Plus, help Jordan with his powers. 

   

Lt. Anderson is filling in for General Lane and they don't have a good working relationship because he doesn't trust Superman for some reason. Of course, this leads to him escalating things that didn't need to be escalated. 

Tal-Rho (Formerly known as Morgan Edge.) has a redemption arc this season. We see him helping Superman and trying to make amends for what he did last season. My issue with this is that it's kind of rushed. Another thing where did he get an A.I. of his and Superman's mother?   

I'm not happy that this series wasted Bizarro! That's saying a lot considering that this is a Superman character that I'm not fond of. For example, the writers could have used Bizarro World as a cautionary tale for what's going on in Smallville. Also, his fortress of solitude is better than Superman's. 

Ally Allston (the main baddie) is a manipulative cult leader who's trying to make her followers feel whole at the expense of their and other people's lives. What annoys me about her is that the show hits that she's a Superman villain and I'm not crazy about it. Also, feeling whole is another theme this season could explore.  

I like that this season plays with our expectations and teases a villain for season three. This season confirms that this show is separated from the other CW shows. (Thank goodness.) Overall, this is not a bad fellow up to season one but it's underwhelming. 

My review of Lightyear

My review of Lightyear 

Intro: Congratulations Chucky! You finally have company because this is the second creepiest thing I've seen. 

 

My editor: Excuse me what about Babidi? 

I'm sorry this is the third creepiest thing I've seen. There is no way that this will sell as much as Elmo, Pikachu and Grogu. (After I saw the Movie.) OK, I like my Crow medium-rare. 

Lightyear: This movie is centered on a space ranger name Buzz Lightyear who is stranded on an unknown planet with other crew members and Buzz tries to figure out a way to get them off the planet. That task becomes difficult when he sees that doing this comes with a price and someone wants the MacGuffin that Buzz needs to travel in space. So, Buzz has to avoid this person and try to complete his objective. 

Pixar not only you be ashamed of yourself for giving us this lifeless movie the people who worked on the Buzz Lightyear cartoon deserve an apology. You can say what you want about the cartoon it was more entertaining and creative than this! Plus, the cartoon did some things better than this movie. If you consider that cartoon to be the black sheep of the Toy Story franchise, then why did you make two references to it? (No! The LGMs are not in this movie.) I appreciate that this movie wants to be about living with the mistakes you make but the movie drops the ball in that department. 

The movie didn't do a good job at world-building; for example, it doesn't focus on how people feel about adjusting to living on a hostile planet. Reinforce what a space ranger is, I mean are they space police or space explorers? Really they wouldn't have ended up on that planet if they used probes to investigate it beforehand. The film also has some head-scratching moments. I find it hard to believe that this movie cost 200 million dollars to make because we only get two locations in this movie.  

I refuse to believe that the Buzz Lightyear toy came from this movie because A Andy never mentioned this movie and B I thought this movie was going to be a parody of sci-fi movies considering what we learn about Buzz. Plus, this movie added things about Buzz that we didn't know before for example, I didn't know his suit can turn you into a fruit. I'm not kidding about that. Also, the writers could've written out two characters in this movie because they serve no purpose in this movie beyond being comic relief and they're not that funny. 

I don't have much to say about the elephant in the room in this movie because it's harmless. I understand why parents would have issues with it, but this is something that kids are going to be exposed to. I'm not saying what Pixar did in this movie was OK however you can't deny that this exists just because we don't like it. Now if the scene lasted for ten seconds or it was hot and heavy then I would understand why parents are outraged over this. Don't get me started on how time travel works in this movie. 

Buzz Lightyear is a by-the-book guy who's all work and no play. That's what bugs me about him he's not as fun as his toy counterpart. I'm not saying he has to be just like him, but at least have him be chumpy or smile. His ARC in the movie is also problematic because he doesn't have the right character traits for it to work and the other thing this movie did with this character could have been resolved sooner. The ACR in this movie was done better in the Star Command pilot movie. Plus, it's hard to appreciate that he's missing out on things because it lacks emotional weight and he broth that on himself. He only knows one person as far as we know and we don't get enough scenes with them together to value their relationship. He also does some questionable and dumb things.  

Alisha Hawthorne (Buzz's CO and best friend.) Is a fun character who bounces off Buzz being a stick in the mud. I don't like that she shared Buzz's famous line. 

Sox is like R2-D2 as far as being helpful. That's what bugs me about him, I mean how and why would a companion robot be this advance? Although Sox is adorable that doesn't make him less crappy or change the fact that he's in the movie to sell toys. Also, I'm not crazy about the cat jokes with him. 

Izzy Hawthorne (Alisha Hawthorne's granddaughter.) Is like her grandmother and has ambitions to become a space ranger. I wish that she had a better dynamic with Buzz.   

Zurg (the main villain) may look menacing but that doesn't make up for the fact that I'm not happy with what this movie did with this character. You'll understand when you watch the movie. (Really, I'm surprised that this wasn't the elephant in the room instead of the "bleep" but I digress.) His goal in the movie is not that bad I mean it won't harm people. because of that, it's hard for me to see him as a villain. The conflict between him and Buzz shouldn't exist when you think about it. Another thing his existence creates a time paradox. I'm also not crazy about his design in this movie. It's not bad but it doesn't match the toy. Did we really need a reason why he's called Zurg?     

Besides some funny bits and making references to other sci-fi films the only compliment I can give this movie is the CGI. The CGI in this movie is stunning to the point where you can notice every detail of the characters and environment. We get one brief moment where Buzz sees how much time has changed. You can argue that this movie did a better job at being about making the best out of your situation than Jurassic World Domination did. Also, this movie will make people appreciate the Buzz Lightyear cartoon.  

Overall, this movie will not be joining Pixar's list of best films. Really this movie shouldn't exist because it's a disservice to what came before. I wouldn't recommend you check this out if you like time travel films because Interstellar and Project Almanac did a better job than this movie.  

Rating = Trash      

My Jurassic World Trilogy review

My Jurassic World Trilogy review 

 

Intro: Did anyone think that a movie with Dinosaurs would beat Marvel at the Box Office? 

Jurassic World: This movie is about an island resort on Isla Nublar that's open to the public, it's called Jurassic World and it features Dinosaurs. Despite the resort running successfully for ten years people are starting to lose interest in dinosaurs, so they create a new attraction with a hybrid dinosaur called the Indominus Rex. That plan is ruined when the Indominus Rex escapes and wreaks havoc on the island. So, the staff has to stop this creature before it destroys everything.   

I consider this movie to be a proper sequel to the first movie. What bothers me about the last two films is that they feel like side stories that didn't do much to push the story forward, that's not the case here. The movie expands on the questions and themes from the first film by putting them into practice. The movie also captures what we love about the first film by paying homage to it without it feeling like the same movie. That was a smart move because it helps the movie be a shared experience for fans and newcomers. The movie is kind of self-aware I mean it makes fun of marketing, sequels and it even took a jab at JP3. The CGI and the resort are a huge improvement over what the first film did. I like the Indominus Rex because of how dangerous this creature is. The Indominus Rex doesn't just pose a threat to the tourist but to the other dinosaurs as well. I'm fond of the Velociraptors in this movie because they're used to explore the theme of control over nature. 

Owen Grady has a similar personality to Ian Malcolm but not as sarcastic. Owen is an ex military and an animal behavior specialist that trains the Velociraptors. That's what I like about this character because doing that makes him the bridge between the Dinosaurs and the humans. Despite training Velociraptors to do tricks looks ridiculous the movie pulled it off. He doesn't control raptors because they're still dangerous animals however he builds a rapport with them. I'm surprised that he has a history with Claire considering how off-putting she is.          

Speaking of Claire Dearing she's a workaholic to the point where she comes off as an ice queen. That's understandable considering that she's the manager of the park and it's a demanding job. I wish we learn more about her. 

Lowery Cruthers (an employee of the resort.) is the comic relief. I have an issue with how he responds to how Claire talks to him. If it was me I wouldn't respond in a civilized matter. Managers need to learn that they're not above getting hurt but I digress. 

Simon Masrani is the owner of Jurassic World, he's kind of like John Hammond but with a carefree spirit. The only complaint I have with him is that he's underdevelopment.  

Vic Hoskins is the head of security of Jurassic World. It's hard for me to consider him the villain because he didn't do anything bad. Yes! He was shady however he had the park's best interest in mind. However, there is one scene in the movie that made him look bad. 

The problem I have with this movie is the movie doesn't explain how the park is open to the public after everything that happened in the last three movies? The kids in this movie annoyed me because the director didn't do anything new with them. I understand why they're in the movie but it doesn't change the fact that it feels tacked on. Also, what was their mother thinking about leaving them with her sister who's too busy to do anything? The movie could have done a better job with the theme of control. There is a minor character from the first film and it's hard to appreciate what this movie has done with him or her because we don't know much about this person in any of the films. I wish the Indominus Rex wasn't viewed as a monster because it's not his or her fault that he or she is like this.  

Overall this movie is a good addition to this franchise, that's saying a lot considering how long it took to make this movie. I would recommend this if you didn't like the last two films.  

Rating = Worth Seeing               

Intro: I'm not feeling any love for this movie. Seriously I don't get why this movie got some much hate. I'm not saying that people are not allowed to dislike or not have issues with a movie however most of the complaints people have with this movie are not valid. The things that bother people about this movie makes them look stupid, hypocritically and pitiful. I was going to do a response to what people have to say about this movie but that would be a waste of time. This is what happens when you focus on what's familiar in a film you don't notice any nuance in it.      

Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom: The movie takes place three years after the events in the last movie and the resort has been shut down since then. One day the public learn that the volcano on Isla Nublar has become active and it could wipe out the dinosaurs. While world leaders are discussing what they should do about the dinosaurs, Claire takes it upon herself to get the dinosaurs off the island with the help of Owen and someone from John Hammond's past. That becomes difficult because of a conspiracy involving the dinosaurs, so Claire and Owen have to figure out what that is.  

This movie is a good way to celebrate the 25 anniversary of this franchise! I say that because the movie made references to the other films and it embraces elements from the novel more than the first film. The subtitle of the movie has three different means in the story. This is also the most entertaining film in this franchise, that's saying a lot considering that this movie can be dark and scary. The pacing in the movie is well done, you don't notice the movie's runtime. I appreciate how this movie incorporates a character from the original trilogy without this person being a part of the story. The new hybrid dinosaur may not be a step up from the previous one however it has a personality. It enjoys taunting its prey before he or she kills it. You can argue that the theme of this movie is responsibility, everyone has a role to play in why the dinosaurs are here and what happens to them. The twist in the movie could open new doors for this franchise. I like the way this movie ended because I was waiting for the franchise to go in this direction for a long time. 

Claire is a much more pleasant character than she was in the last movie. You really feel her pain when something undermines her ability to save the dinosaurs.     

Owen is jaded due to the events of the last film to the point where he has regrets.   

Franklin is a big chicken in this movie. OK, I'm being unfair if I was on an island full of untamed dinosaurs I would run and scream like a little girl too. 

Zia is the best female character in this franchise! I say that because she keeps her cool instead of screaming her head off, she's also sassy.    

I don't have a lot to say about Benjamin Lockwood because he's underdeveloped in this movie. I wish he was the villain to make up for John Hammond not being the bad guy in the first film. 

Eli Mills is an actual villain in this franchise. He's a ruthless man who will let nothing stand in his way of making a profit. 

One of the problems I have with this movie is it seems to retcon the origin of these dinosaurs. Blue doesn't really need to be in the movie when you think about it. The trailers gave away too much of the film. All in all, this is an underrated film that deserves a second viewing. 

Rating = Worth Seeing 

  

Intro: OK what was the point of showing us that five-minute preview if it's not going to be in the movie? 

Jurassic World Dominion: This movie takes place four years after the events of the last film and we see how Dinosaurs and humans are able to co-exist. Owen is reunited with Blue and she has a child. This reunion is short-lived when someone kidnaps Blue's kid, So Owen has to find her or him. 

Epic conclusion my butt! (Considering that this movie left doors open for more movies.) One of my gripes with this movie is the pacing is slow and it didn't focus on the premise of dinosaurs roaming the earth. I wish the movie gives us the public's perspective on the dinosaurs walking among them, I mean everyone can't be happy about it. This film tried to give someone a redemption arc but it's hard to appreciate it when we don't know much about this person. Despite being happy that this movie brings in an element from the novel, the movie could have done a better job with it. I have two issues with the characters from the original trilogy being in this movie. First of all, they are here for nostalgia bait kind of. Second, What the writers are doing with them is small in the grand scheme of things. The movie also suffers from plot holes like who's idea was it to expose the public to certain information and why did (censor) get away with (censor)? The ending was hard to swallow.   

Besides giving Owen and Claire a stable relationship, the movie hasn't done anything with them beyond being parental figures to Maisie. It's hard to appreciate this dynamic because we don't get a tender scene with the three. The movie was trying to give Claire an arc at the beginning of the film, but the movie drops it. 

As far as Alan Grant, Ellie Sattler and Ian Malcolm are the same characters as we remember for the most part. The problem I have with these three is Ellie is overshadowed by the other two. That's a shame because she's the driving force of the second plot. 

Maisie is a frustrated teenage girl. That's understandable considering how she's living. After how we responded when trouble hit the fan two years ago parents should be more understanding of putting their kids in this situation. What annoys me about her is her backstory. It undermines what we thought we know about her and opens up a can of worms. 

Kayla is just in the movie to aid Owen and Claire on their journey. She starts off as a tough woman, but she softens up though out the film. 

I like that this movie gave us a lot of dinosaur actions, moments and different species. When the old characters met the new characters, they play off each other well. The movie has funny moments and easter eggs. If there is a theme or message in the movie it's making the best of our circumstances. This was my most anticipated movie of the year and it was the weakest of this trilogy. I'm not saying the movie is bad however the writers could have done more with the story.

Rating = Average 

My rant about mass shootings

 My rant about mass shootings 

Intro: OK I didn’t want to talk about this because A I don’t have much to say about this topic. Plus, I covered bits and pieces of this in my other posts. B people in power don’t seem to take this seriously. The reason why I’m talking about this is because of the suggestion that was made to fix this issue.

In case you don’t watch the news or live in the wilderness there has been two mass shooting this month. One happened at a supermarket in Buffalo New York and the other happened at an elementary school in Texas. The reason why I mentioned that people in power are not taking this seriously is that they love to blame video games for this. Do I really have to make fun of them for doing that? You know what you shouldn’t have any authority if you think video games are the blame for everything. Not only that they are making it hard for citizens to carry firearms with gun control and background checks. The second amendment is the right to bear arms without the Government infringing on that right. I don't see the point in background checks, I mean anyone can lose their minds and most gun owners are not crazy. You can’t have it both ways you can’t say that we can’t rely on law enforcement and then take issue with the citizens arming themselves. How the police handled the elementary school shooting reinforces that.  

Since we’re on the subject I think it’s messed up that the eighteen-year-old can’t buy a gun. I mean they're old enough to join the Army and live on their own, but they can't buy a gun what gives? This should be a package deal either they are old enough for all three things or none of them at all. I hope congress won’t raise the age for all three things because that could create another problem. Being old enough for something is one thing mature enough that’s something else. Adults have moments where they act like fools. Why do I need to be mentally evaluated to have a God-given right? Why won’t people talk about bullying? I mean that’s one of the characteristics of a school shooter. If you think it’s acceptable for kids to be subjected to humiliation and bodily harm, then you shouldn’t make a big deal about this or kids being molested by their teachers. What are the fundamental differences between these three things?   

Really, I’m surprised that we still have this problem, I mean this has been going on for 15 years and I thought we profile the shooters. Last I checked they are the type of people who keep to themselves, immature, socially awkward and neglected by their parents. This is one of the reasons why it’s hard for me to take these shootings seriously because I’m the type of person that keeps to himself and people are still starting trouble with me. The other reason is that this is the down side of advocating for people owning guns unfortunately. I mean you can't say you want the right to firearm and then complain when this happens. That makes you indirectly responsible for mass shootings. The same thing goes with alcohol, if you like to go to bar or night clubs you don't get to complain about DUI. 

I don’t mind profiling shooters as long as you don’t single people out for having those traits because that could make things worse. Instead of doing that we should be helping them work past or through that stigma. I would like to know why we have this problem because there was a time when we can have a rifle outside of the school and we use to teach our youth how to use guns depending on where they lived. Now we are number one for most school shootings how did this happen? 

Now there are people talking about hardening the schools and having the teachers carry a gun. I’m not crazy about this idea. I know I asked why we don’t protect kids the way we protect money however I don’t think the ends justify the means. Also, we might be manipulated into going in this direction. I say that because there is more going on with the Buffalo shooting than the news is telling us. Look up Aaron Salter and you’ll see what I mean. Another thing this suggestion makes us look like hypocrites. I mean people are thin skin now because they don’t want to step out of their comfort zone because it makes them feel safe. So, staying in a bubble is harmful to your development but it’s OK to put them in a bubble to keep kids safe. (To be fair we put criminals and mentally ill people in a bubble so maybe that wasn’t the best argument.) How is doing this going to put the kid’s minds at ease? If you saw the interviews with the surviving children, they are afraid of guns how is putting them in a place full of them going to make them move past their ordeal?

Public Schools are already a prison you don’t think turning them onto one is going to make things worse? What about teens? We all know how testy they are what if they get in a fight with one of the teachers and the teacher shoots and kill the student in self-defense would you be OK with that? Guns are not the only thing you can use to kill people how will you guard against pencils and scissors? Look I’m not saying we shouldn’t lower the risks of this happening however parents need to do a better job at coming to terms with the fact that their kids will be exposed to the ugly side of life. Also, watching your kids grow up is a luxury we wouldn’t have the sex trafficking ring and kids dying of leukemia if that wasn’t the care. Plus, we don't want to risk alienating each other by projecting our fears onto each other. Another thing what about people who work at fast-food you don't think they need protection? That’s all I have to say about this subject for now. 

P.S. If you can stomach what a shotgun can do to the human body then you shouldn't want one. 

My thoughts on the Star Wars Sequel Trilogy

My thoughts on the Star Wars Sequel Trilogy 

Intro: OK I will try to keep this short and sweet because I know I'm beating a dead horse. Plus, I wanted to wait for everyone to air out their grievances with this trilogy before I do. 

This year marks the tenth anniversary of Disney owning the rights to Star Wars. They made five movies they are one trilogy and two spin-offs. Sadly, fans are not happy with what this company has done with this franchise. They despise these movies so much that they want them retcon. You don't think that's a slap in the face to the kids who grew up with this trilogy and the people who worked on it? The fans find this trilogy so bad that it's not good enough to make parody videos out of these movies. (Heck, the merchandise is not selling.) This trilogy makes me want to give a backhanded compliment to the prequels. They were bad in a creative way. 

Plus, there are things around the prequels that I enjoy. 

That's saying a lot considering that this trilogy has some of the same problems as the Prequels which is bad writing and not explaining things. To be fair, we have novels to make up for the prequel's shortcomings. The sequel trilogy is bad in a lazy way. I'll elaborate on that later. The fact that people despise both trilogies tells me two things. Either Star Wars has lost its novelty, or fans are too afraid to admit that the original trilogy was also bad. I'm surprised that Disney didn't use George Lucas's outline of the sequel trilogy, considering that they had no plans for this trilogy.  

Speaking of Mr. Lucas, I was rolling on the floor laughing when the fans said they wanted him to come back and do this trilogy. Let me get this straight, you access this man of raping your childhood, made a documentary vilifying him, gave him so much crap over the prequels, the special editions, and you even said that you don't want him anywhere near this franchise that he created. Now you're going to give him a backhanded compliment by saying that the prequels are good. I'm sorry, but you can't burn a bridge and expect someone to save you. 

I have mixed feelings about Mr. Lucas. On one hand, I do feel bad for him because of how fans are giving him a hard time. In a Vanity Fair interview, he said he feels like he's being restricted from making movies a certain way because of the fan's backlash. Look, Mr. Lucas, being creative is not a problem; however, if you go against what was established, then it's an issue. On the other hand, he's not taking responsibility for why fans feel this way about him. He didn't acknowledge that the fans made some valid points, pointing out the mistakes he made with this franchise. Also, I'm tired of him hiding behind this franchise was made for kids excuse, because A that's no excuse for you to be lazy. B You can't make a movie for kids without the kids who grew up with Star Wars in mind. 

The fans can blame JJ Abrams, Rian Johnson and Kathleen Kennedy all they want for how these movies turned out but that doesn't change the fact that they play a role in this as well. I say that because they are acting like women as far as sending mixed messages. After the prequels, you said you want the movies to be more like the original. Disney did that with The Force Awakens and you complain that it's too similar to the original. Despite The Last Jedi being almost similar to the Empire Strikes Back, it was too different from Star Wars and that got fans upset. The Rise of Skywalker tried to do damage control, but the damage is done. Do you see what I mean? This makes me mad because the fans got a studio to listen to them and they ruined it for other fanbases. I'm not just saying that because the fans kept flip-flopping it's because of how they lashed out at everyone who worked on these movies. 

Even Mark Hamill is disgusted by our behavior. Fans should be ashamed of themselves because acting like this shows that this franchise had no impact on them. I mean this franchise tells us that fear and anger are bad things,

 

yet you let those emotions get the best of you to the point where you take it out on people who don't deserve it. 

Seriously don't you feel bad that you chase the actor or actress off of social media and them wanting to commit suicide because of you? It's a shame that Transformers is the most civilized fans we have. Granted! I do talk about wanting to hurt someone when I get mad or disappointed however it's directed at the writers, directors and producers. Plus, I'm sarcastic about it. I'm not a sadistic person, my threats don't go beyond wishing people had cancer or die the most harmful and painful death. 

My editor: The devil is a liar! (He's reading my journey.) When I see Zack Synder, I'm going to chop off his fingers, burn off half his face, crack his ribs with a sledgehammer, run over his legs and rip out his... 

Me: Hey! Are you trying to get me canceled?  

Look I'm not saying that you don't have the right to dislike these films however, you shouldn't go on about it in a way that makes you look toxic and entitled. As far as this trilogy goes, it didn't anger me as much as everyone else. Considering that Disney discontinued the Star Wars EU, Lucas Arts is disbanded and this trilogy has a female lead I saw this coming, I didn't think it was going to be this bad. As far as the spin-off movies goes I didn't watch them because I didn't care about them. Also, is it me or does Rouge One remind you of Halo Reach? 

With that said I enjoyed the first film out of all of them which isn't saying much. The Last Jedi had potential but it's wasted. Rise of Skywalker is the worst of the worst. The people who worked on the first movie should have taken notes from Jurassic World because that movie did a better job at doing something different with a familiar story. As far as The Last Jedi goes I understand making divisive movies is Rian Johnson's MO but that shouldn't come at the expense of an already-established franchise. Subverting our expectations is pointless if it hurts the story. If you want a good example of how to do that watch Million Dollar Baby. For the most part, this trilogy is the same as the original trilogy because the characters are different from the original trilogy the story won't have the same impact on them. 

One of the problems I have with this trilogy is the First Order. I mean we don't know where they came from or how much manpower they have. This is the same issue I have with Snoke, I mean he's just as old or maybe older than the empire so where has he been all of this time? Speaking of Snoke if you're OK with how he was killed off then you should have no problem with Emperor Palpatine being in the third movie. As far as Emperor Palpatine goes, I can't believe that Disney is going to adapt the worst part of the Star Wars EU to bring this character back. Cloning opens up so many cans of worms that I don't want to get into. Also, bringing this character back undermines the original trilogy and the sequel trilogy. Regardless of how you feel about Snoke, you can't deny that the creators wrote themselves in a corner with how he was killed off.  

I know thirty years have passed but this is a franchise with world-building you can't just throw in a new threat with no rhyme or reason. Whatever victory the rebels have over them means nothing because they come back bigger and better. It's hard for me as a viewer to take the first order seriously because of how it's run. I mean everyone is screaming at each other, this is something you expect in a domestic dispute, not in a military organization. I feel bad for Gen. Hucks (the General of the first order) because both Snoke and Kylo undermine and humiliate him in front of his subordinates. Doing that is the quickest way to start a coup that's what happened on the rebel's side but I'm getting ahead of myself. Doing that doesn't boost the General's morale to lead the first order and it doesn't boost the subordinate's morale to follow his orders. I wasn't surprised that Gen. Hunk's sold out the first order because I would have done the same thing.  

Having Rey as the main character was a mistake because of how protective society is of women we don't get to see female characters struggle, rough up, or get their comeuppance in the media. This is why she's portrayed as a Mary Sue for most of the trilogy. Portraying female characters like this has caused more harm than good because we have women who have no respect for men. I'm glad that we have men vs women sports because they need to be reminded that they are the weaker sex. 

My editor: Whoa! Saying that will get you canceled. 

Me: You can shoot the messenger all you want but the facts are the fact. 

Rey started off as interesting as far as being a scavenger learning how to fend for herself and she's waiting for someone. That goes down the toilet when she meets Fin and that's a shame because this trilogy had a chance to give her things, she could work on but the writers didn't do that. For example, the creators could have made her selfish and not trust anyone due to her being abandoned by her parents because that makes sense. She doesn't want to believe that her parents the people who suppose to love her abandoned her. The writers did that with The Last Jedi but it lacks the emotional weight that it could have had. Speaking of Ray's parents I didn't mind them being nobodies because it helps reinforce that the force is mystical and not biological. Which was a problem I had with the Prequels. Plus, this is a lot better than what we got in Rise of Skywalker. What bugs me about them is the movie makes a big deal about them. 

To be fair her being Palpatine's granddaughter; would have worked if she knew from day one.  I mean the reason why she stays on Jakku is that she knows no one will want anything to do with her if they found out who she's related to. Doing this will help her dynamic with Fin and parallel with Luke. Fin is trying to run away for the first order and Rey is trying to hide from the world. Luke wants to know about his father Rey doesn't. After she reluctantly joins Fin, she gains allies and friends. When she reveals that she's Palpatine's granddaughter it doesn't change how they see her because that shouldn't define who you are. Doing that would be Star Wars way of telling a nature vs nurture story. It's hard to go in that direction with Rey because this is the same plot from the first Ratchet and Clank game.  

As far as Rey having a romance with Kylo it would have been interesting to see Star Wars doing their own version of Romeo and Juliet. (Plus make up for Anakin and Padme's romance.) However, I don't see how the writers can pull that off without both parties losing credibility with their respected groups. Also, why would Rey want to be with someone she can map the floor with? Am I the only one insulted to see her train in the last film? We already know you're OP so what's the point of this? 

Kylo Ren is wasted in this trilogy. I say that because we don't know much about him. I like what was done with him in The Last Jedi but the writers ruined it. This character starts off as an emotionally unstable man who's trying to live up to Darth Vader. This characterization ruins this character. I mean the viewers can't take him seriously if he's throwing temper tantrums. Also, it's hard to appreciate how dangerous he is in Luke's eyes when we don't see him cause much death and destruction. In The Last Jedi, he's done with his Vader worship and tries to be more calm and collected. That gets thrown out the window in the third act because he reverts to what he was and to make this worse he's taking orders from Emperor Palpatine in the next movie. After sensing that his mother died he switches sides and this amounts to nothing. If Rey and Kylo had a better relationship it could have mattered.  

Luke Skywalker where do I begin? Look I don't mean that a character falls from grace or having a change of heart however those things have to make sense with the character. Also, that didn't happen here because this is not Luke Skywalker. Luke wouldn't turn his back on the Galaxy and his family especially if he played a role in why the Galaxy is in trouble in the first place. Even if the reason why Luke doesn't want to train Jedi anymore is because he reached the same conclusion as Bendu that doesn't change the fact that everyone else is vulnerable to the dark side. Really, I'm surprised Yoda didn't want the Jedi to end I mean it would make sense why he would feel this way considering everything that happened in the prequels. So, Luke saw visions of Kylo causing death and destruction but not the role he played in it. Does Leia know Luke was thinking about killing her son? What bugs about this character is his interaction with Kylo in the last act. I mean he didn't say I'm sorry or I failed you he treats him like he's beyond saving. What gives? 

Luke: What? Did you expect me to take out my laser sword and take on the entire first order? 

No! I expect you to do something useful. Plus, doing that would be as ridiculous as giving Yoda a lightsaber. I didn't mind him using the force projection to save the rebels, but I wish he didn't do it from a long distance. His death scene wasn't good because it was isolated, I mean the people who know him weren't by his side at the end. That's what bothers me about Han and Leia's death scenes.  

I don't have much to say about Poe Dameron all we know about him is that he's an ace pilot. I
wish he was with Fin and Rey in the first movie. I mean wasn't the point of having three new leads if we barely see them together? We learn that he wasn't always an upstanding guy in the last movie but that amounts to nothing. In the second film, the writers tried to give him an arc of knowing when to lead and when to follow. The problem with that arc is that it wasn't done well. Leia demotes Poe for going against her order then later on she lets him back in the field. After Leia is in the hospital Gen. Holdo takes her place and all we get is them bickering over her plan until Leia gets back. After their back and forth, she gives him a backhanded complaint saying she likes him What the fudge!?! 

This wouldn't have been pointless and a waste of time if Holdo told Poe about her plan. Her excuse for not telling him is that he's a hothead. What is she talking about he wasn't like that with you and how is keeping him in the dark going to put him in a better mood? If your response to this is he should respect the chain of command first of all, where was your respect for the chain of command when Mr. Trump was in office? Second, There's more to being in charge than giving orders you have to put your subordinate's minds at ease with things go wrong. If you don't do that and you're calm about things going wrong you get a coup which ends up happening here. 

I wish I could say that Fin is the best character in this trilogy but the writers ruined him in the
last two films. Even the actor who plays this character wasn't happy with what was done to this character. I would be outraged too because it seems like the marketing pulled a bait-and-switch on us with this character. Fin starts off as a stormtrooper who somehow breaks free from his condition. After that, he helps Poe escape the first order so that he can get as far away from them as he can. After meeting Rey and forming a bond with her he develops to courage to stand up to the first order. In The Last Jedi, the writers hit the reset button with this character. (I still can't get over how fast he was able to recover from getting hit in the spine with a Lightsaber.) The subplot of him and Rose is insulting because it serves as a PSA on how bad war is. Considering what's going on between Russia and Ukraine that part of the movie didn't age well. He's face-off with Capt. Phasma was a joke. In the rise of Skywalker, all he does is shout Rey! and try to tell her that he loves her. How this trilogy handled this character makes me sick because he could have worked as the main character. 

The other problems I have with this trilogy are the MCU style of humor, the force and the themes in The Last Jedi. How the force works in this movie makes me question if there are any limits to the force? If you can use the force to communicate and touch people from a long distance, then why can't they teleport? Don't get me started on force healing! I don't like it because it eliminates any tension in a dire situation. Really, having this ability undermines episode 3. Do I really have to comment on Leia's Mary Poppen moment? Why didn't Leia use The Force to move the rocks? The themes in The Last Jedi is learning from your mistakes and letting the past die. The issue I have with the first theme is that it doesn't work if characters don't admit to their screw-ups. That's what bugs me about Yoda being in this movie because he could have acknowledged that the Jedi failed because of him not following the well of the force and gotten soft since the Sith haven't been around in a long time. How does this theme apply to Rey? I mean she hasn't made any mistakes so why have a theme that doesn't affect the main character? As far as letting the past die, I find it insulting considering the writers are using the past to tell their story. This theme could have worked if it was used properly in the story. 

Overall, Disney has dropped the ball with this trilogy. It's sad that this franchise can't have any success outside of the original trilogy era for the most part. 

It would be a miracle if we get any more movies out of this franchise not just because Disney is going down the toilet it's because the fans are starting to make this a franchise that no one wants to touch.  

                    

My review of the legend of Korra

My review of the legend of Korra

Intro: Show of hands who thinks making a sequel series to Avatar the last airbender was a good idea?  

 

The legend of Korra: This series takes place a century after the events of Avatar the last airbender and a new Avatar name Korra appears. With the exception of airbending, she manages to master the elements and there are threats popping up around the nation. So, Korra has to learn airbending in order to fulfill her role as the Avatar. 

This was not a good follow-up to Avatar the last airbender! That's kind of a shame because despite me not being on board with this series I was course to see how the writers could expand on what was established in that series. The creators seem to be aware that trying to top its predecessor is a tall order, so the creators tried to do something different. For example, instead of getting us one simple story, we get four different stories for each season. I feel like I'm watching a graphic novel. To be fair this was suppose to be a short series. Seasons 2 and 4 can get ridiculous to the point where you feel like you're watching Godzilla or Mobile Suit Gundam. Speaking of season 2 that was the worst season out of the four because it started off as one thing and turns into something else. The problem with the conflict in seasons one and four is that we don't see it. 

This series is more character-driven than its predecessor. I wouldn't have minded that if the subplot were used to develop the characters instead of putting them in boxes. When the supporting characters have more development than the main characters you know you screwed up. It's hard to care about the new team Avatar because they spend more time apart. Most of the villains in this show are forgettable. They have fine motivation however they go about achieving their goals in a way that doesn't make them look bad. 

The world-building in this series opens up a can of worms. We get an explanation to the origins of bending and the avatar let's just say less is more. I'm having a hard time buying that society has become this advance in 100 years. For example, republic city looks like 1920's New York. When we see the other nations, they are not as advanced because their culture is based on the bender's ability. In republic city, bending is trivialized for the most part and reduced to sports. The show tried to bland the same animation from the previous series with CGI and it sticks out like a sore thumb. The clip note episode is wasted I mean it could have been better if it was a movie serial.  

Korra is hotheaded, bratty and determined. It's understandable why she likes this because she has gone through the same journey as the other Avatars before her. Plus, we get an explanation to why she's treated differently from the other avatars. Despite all of that, she does have a good heart. Those character traits are the reason why she's having trouble with airbending. What bugs me about her is that when she finally learns airbending it was odd. I mean it came out of the blue. I find it hard to swallow that she can master the other three elements with ease. I get why the creators did this to prevent this series from being a copy of the previous show, but you can pull it off without doing that. What's the point of being the Avatar if you're not one of the best or the best bender? That's what this series could have done with Korra. Don't you find it funny that this character got so much focus that she barely develops? Plus, the writers made her look bad in season 2. 

Tenzin (One of Aang's kids.) is Korra's mentor. He's calm, serious and has funny moments with his family. He still feels the effects of the 100-year wars because his family are the only airbenders.  

Bolin (Mako's brother.) Is fun-loving and laid-back. That's what annoys me about this character because he's the comic relief we don't get any serious scenes with him and it makes him look stupid.  

Mako is a stick in the mud. I don't like the love triangle he's in because he has no chemistry with either of the women and he it makes him look bad playing both of them. 

Asami is a kind and caring person who can take care of herself. I'm surprised she like this considering her upbringing. My gripe with her is that she's underused. It's hard to appreciate her dynamic with her father because the show didn't focus on it. The series drop hits that there's more to her relationship with Korra. I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, I can buy where the writers are going with these two because females can be close to each other in a way that men can't. On the other hand, you can't have it both ways. I mean if the creators are afraid to expose their relationship, then it shouldn't have been in the show. 

Lin is the Chief of Police in Republic city and Toph's daughter. She's an uptight no-nonsense person. That makes sense considering who her mom is plus she has family issues. 

Varrick is a better comic relief character than Bolin. Don't ask why comedy is subjective. He's also a shady character. The only complaint I have with him is his assistant, I wish she express her feelings sooner than later.           

I like that this series continues to explore the ability to bend the elements. It's good to see some of the legacy characters. Each season tried to be about something. Season one was about equality, season two was about spirituality, season three was about freedom and season four was about control. I appreciate this series trying to address the issue of PTSD I just wish it didn't come at the expense of character development. This series addresses other serious issues like family trauma. The beginning of season three reflex our current situation.

Overall, this series is a mess that I wouldn't recommend checking out. 

My Sonic the Hedgehog 2 review

 My Sonic the Hedgehog 2 review 

 

Intro: The people who keep posting spoilers need to get slapped. Seriously, if it were up to me, I would ban people from social media for doing this. If Mr. Trump can get banned, why can't they?

Sonic the Hedgehog 2: This movie takes place 8 months after the events of the first film, and Sonic is using his powers to do good. One day, Dr. Robotnik returns to Earth with an ally, and together they are looking for a MacGuffin that will give him ultimate power for world domination. So, Sonic has to find it before Dr. Robotnik does.

I enjoyed this movie more than the last one, but that's not saying much. I like that this movie builds off the last films, for example, we learned why Sonic was chased out of his homeworld? This movie is more of an action-adventure film than the previous one. The movie focuses mostly on the Sonic characters rather than the human ones. The movie has a subtle message about acceptance. Of course, you can't have a movie like this without easter eggs, and I appreciate the writers trying to be creative with the Sonic lore.  

Sonic is a cocky, confident, wisecracker who goes through a hero's journey. That's my problem with him his hero's journey has no pay-off. Also, I wish he was mature. I mean, the movie treats him like a kid, and that undermines him as a character. 

Tails is just like his video game counterpart as far as being smart. I'm glad that the movie got the voice actress who's voiced this character for over ten years. His dynamic with Sonic is just like in the games as far as having a big brother-little brother relationship. What bugs me about this character is that he serves no purpose in the movie beyond explaining things. 

Knuckles is a noble, naive, and fierce warrior of the Echidna tribe. This is refreshing considering how this character is turned into a joke in certain games. He also provides some of the humor in this movie by taking things literally. My only gripe with him is that the conflict between him and Sonic lacks the emotional weight that it could have had. 

Dr. Robotnik is more diabolical in this movie. Considering that this is Mr. Carry's last movie, I hope this won't be the last time we see this character. After seeing what this movie teased for the third movie, he needs to be in it. This complaint is about Agent Stone (Dr. Robotnik's right-hand man.) The way he misses him makes me question their relationship.

One of the problems with this movie is the climax; it wasn't bad, but something happened that came out of nowhere with no build-up. Plus, it eliminates the tension in the climax. Bringing Sonic characters into the human world was a mistake because giving the humans any screen time takes away the focus from Sonic and the others. There is a twist involving the human characters to get us to care about what's going on with them. It doesn't work because we don't know these people, and the lighthearted tone ruins it. Speaking of tone, you can't take certain things seriously because the tone doesn't match the scene. Some of the effects don't look good, the floss and meow joke still didn't work.   

Overall, this movie didn't break the curse, but it's a step in the right direction.  

Rating = Average